With Details About Rob Reiner's Son Coming to Light, It Seems This Situation...
FBI Releases New Images of the Suspect in the Brown University Shooting
It's About Time: Trump Has Designated This a Weapon of Mass Destruction
If These Three Words Dominate a News Presser, You Shouldn't Go on Television
After a Shooting the Press Fired Blanks As They Aim for Gun Control;...
The Trial of Milwaukee Judge Hannah Dugan Started Today. Here's the Day One...
From Anxiety to Alignment: What This Week’s Data Tells Us About the Right’s...
Candace Owens Faces Erika Kirk After Months of Promoting Theories About Charlie Kirk’s...
President Trump Files $10 Billion Lawsuit Against the BBC for Edited Jan. 6...
Jake Tapper Says He’s Extra Tough on Trump to Make Up For Failing...
Progressive Podcast Host Says Charlie Kirk 'Justified' His Death Because He Supported Gun...
This Actress Had an Insane Meltdown Over Trump Calling a Reporter 'Piggy'
Sen. John Kennedy Mocks Jasmine Crockett’s Senate Bid: ‘The Voices in Her Head...
Chile Elects Trump-Style Conservative José Antonio Kast as President
Rabbi Killed in Antisemitic Terror Attack Had His Warnings Ignored by the Australian...
Tipsheet

ICYMI: Here's Why Three Astronauts Have Endorsed McSally and not Mark Kelly

AP Photo/Keystone/Martial Trezzini

Three former astronauts are endorsing Sen. Martha McSally (R-AZ) in her special election battle against astronaut and Democratic challenger Mark Kelly. 

"We remember a not-so-distant past when the Air Force wouldn’t let women fly in combat. Instead of sitting down accepting the status quo, McSally stood up, fought for change and made strides for generations of women to follow her," astronauts Tom Stafford, Charlie Duke and Jack Lousma wrote in an OpEd recently published in The Arizona Central. 

Advertisement

The astronauts say that while McSally has a record of accomplishments to point to, Kelly's positions remain largely unknown. The three are accusing Kelly of hiding his left-wing agenda behind the word "astronaut."

"But having 'astronaut' on your resume does not mean you’d be a good U.S. senator," the astronauts write. "Mark Kelly is hoping Arizonans are so impressed with his background that they ignore the fact that he’s supported radical gun control activists, that his plan for the eventual government takeover of health care would end Medicare as we know it, and that he’d vote to raise our taxes."

The astronauts argue that Kelly will answer to the radical policies of his party if elected to the Senate because his election would help Democrats take back control of the government. 

"They’re planning on taking away the filibuster — the higher vote threshold to pass legislation — to push through their agenda over the objections of hundreds of millions of Americans. This is not hypothetical. Democrats laid out their strategy in plain sight," the astronauts warn. 

"McSally has delivered for Arizona, while Mark Kelly embraces Democrat ideology that would be bad for our country — leaving us with less freedoms, less security and less control of our lives." 

Advertisement

As Leah pointed out earlier, a Kelly victory could be a game-changer in the Democrats' bid to block the confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett to the U.S. Supreme Court. If Barrett isn't confirmed by election day, and if Kelly defeats McSally, Kelly could be in the Senate on November 30, which would narrow the Republican majority from 53-47 to 52-48. Democrats would only need to peel away two votes from the GOP column, then, to prevent Barrett's confirmation. 

Real Clear Politics' average currently shows Kelly leading McSally by six points but still considers the race to be a toss-up. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos