What Secretary Hegseth Just Said About the Narco-Terrorist Airstrikes Will Surely Trigger...
Trump's Agriculture Secretary Is About to Go Scorched Earth on Blue States Over...
Suspect in National Guard Shooting Just Gave His Plea
The WaPo Hegseth War Crime Claims Are Blasted Like a Drug Boat by...
What Happened to the Threat of Christian Nationalism?
WaPo’s Botched Hegseth Hit Job Proves the Pentagon Desperately Needs New Media
Requiem for a Scandal
Matt Van Epps Clinches Victory in Tennessee’s 7th District Special Election
DOT Audit Finds One-Third of Minnesota’s Non-Domiciled CDLs Were Issued Illegally
Children's Book Publisher Furious that Franklin the Turtle is Fighting Narco Terrorism
Trump Officially Nullifies All Biden-Era Autopen Pardons
New Indiana Congressional Map is Approved in the House, Advances to the Senate
Costco Sues to Reclaim Millions Paid Under Trump Tariffs
The Hardest Working President: Trump Works 12-Hour Days Amid Media Speculation of 'Fatigue...
Guess How Many Illegal Immigrant Criminals Letitia James Let Back Out on the...
Tipsheet

Here's Sidney Powell's Legal Argument for Wanting Dominion's Defamation Lawsuit Thrown Out

AP Photo/Ben Margot

The Trump campaign's former attorney, Sidney Powell, is asking a judge to toss out Dominion Voting System's $1.3 billion defamation lawsuit. Following the Nov. 3, 2020 presidential campaign, Powell repeatedly claimed the election was rigged in favor of Joe Biden, something Dominion said was outright false.

Advertisement

According to Powell, what she said fell under First Amendment protections and were her opinions, not something rooted in facts. Her legal team made the argument that “reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact but view them only as claims that await testing by the courts through the adversary process.”

"Given the highly charged and political context of the statements, it is clear that Powell was describing the facts on which she based the lawsuits she filed in support of President Trump. Indeed, Plaintiffs themselves characterize the statements at issue as 'wild accusations' and 'outlandish claims,'" the motion reads. 

"...the speech at issue here is not actionable. As political speech, it lies at the core of First Amendment protection; such speech must be 'uninhibited, robust, and wide-open,'" the motion says. "Additionally, in light of all the circumstances surrounding the statements, their context, and the availability of the facts on which the statements were based, it was clear to reasonable persons that Powell’s claims were her opinions and legal theories on a matter of utmost public concern. Those members of the public who were interested in the controversy were free to, and did, review that evidence and reached their own conclusions—or awaited resolution of the matter by the courts before making up their minds. Under these circumstances, the statements are not actionable."

Advertisement

Powell's attorney, Howard Kleinhendler, said the former Trump attorney stands by her statements and views.

“It’s her opinion, based on her view of the factual affidavits that were presented to her,” Kleinhendler told the Wall Street Journal.

Dominion Voting Systems' attorney Tom Clare slammed Powell's claims. 

 “Powell’s attempt to dismiss the case contradicts her claim that she wants to present her evidence in court. Dominion Voting Systems is eager for the case to move forward and intends to hold Powell accountable," Clare told the WSJ in a statement.

Should the judge refuse to dismiss the case, Powell's attorneys are asking the federal court to move the case from Washington, D.C. to Texas, where she resides.

Dominion also has a pending defamation lawsuit pending against Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani. They are also seeking $1.3 billion in damages from Giuliani, Reuters reported.

Powell's full motion can be read here.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement