Pete Hegseth Needs to Settle All the Family’s Business
Secret Service Agent: Charlie Kirk Got What He Deserved
Here Are Some Heinous Members of the Professional Class Who Cheered Charlie Kirk's...
Here's a Liberal Media Take on Charlie Kirk That Was Classy
President Trump's Trip to Yankees Stadium on 24th Anniversary of 9/11 Attacks Was...
No, South Park, You Didn't Need to Yank the Charlie Kirk Episode
Jen Psaki: Trump's Remarks on Charlie Kirk Assassination Is Escalating the Situation
The Democratic Party is Evil, And Has No Excuse For It
When You Don't Have an Answer, Shoot
BREAKING: Trump Announces Huge Development in Manhunt for Kirk Assassin
UN Watch Delivers the Perfect Response to Critics of Israel Targeting Hamas in...
Watch: Vance Escorts Kirk's Coffin Before Air Force Two Flight Brings Him Home
The Values That Endure Beyond Division – In Memory of Charlie Kirk
My Friend Charlie Kirk: The Biggest Threat to Leftism Today
Turbocharging Trump’s Golden Age: Deregulation and Investment Acceleration
Tipsheet

Pentagon Spokesman Chimes In on NYT's Terrible Memorial Day Editorial

AP Photo/Bebeto Matthews, File

Instead of remembering the fallen servicemen and women on Memorial Day, the New York Times editorial board decided to publish an editorial about how the United States Military supposedly advocates for white supremacy. Specifically, the editorial board took issue with Military bases being named leaders in the Confederate Army. In their mind, the bases should be renamed. 

Advertisement

"It is time to rename bases for American heroes — not racist traitors," the editorial stated.

Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs Jonathan Hoffman slammed the editorial board, saying the group of so-called journalists decided to "attack the US military" instead of paying tribute to the "many stories of valor still waiting to be told this Memorial Day weekend."

As Ellie pointed out, naming military bases after Confederate leaders wasn't promoting white supremacy but was a way of bringing the north and south together after the Civil War:

The base naming, the column concludes, was an effort to placate the south after the war and embrace the era of Jim Crow laws. What the editorial board did not discover through "expertise, research, and debate," however, was that not long after the Civil War, the United States was at war with Spain. Bitterness from the bloody fighting between the north and the south during the Civil War caused national concern that conflict with Spain and subsequent foreign affairs would not be successful without a united front. 

Allowing the U.S. military bases to bear names of southern leaders was seen as an olive branch to the south, still reeling from the loss of the war and the blood-soaked battlefields in their backyards. It was never meant to condone racial prejudice, which was still very prominent in northern and southern states at that time. 

Advertisement

Regardless of how the NYT feels about military bases being named after Confederate leaders, Memorial Day is not the day to push this issue. If they want to make the case that bases in the south should be renamed, then fine. So be it. But pick one of the other 364 days of the year, not the day that is dedicated to remembering the fallen.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement