There's a New DNI Chief...and Heads Are Going to Roll
James Talarico Still Can't Escape His Past
Josh Shapiro Actually Said This About the Democratic Party
Following a Bloody Weekend, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Touts City's Bizarre Emergency D...
After Letting the Homeless Freeze to Death, Mamdani Announces 'Extreme Heat' Executive Ord...
Acting AG Todd Blanche Announces Healthcare Fraud Charges Against Hundreds of Defendants
Scott Wiener Gets Dragged for Saying the Rainbow Is About 'Pride'
Despite Democrats' Best Efforts, Title IX Turns 54
Illegal Immigrant Busted After Using Uber Gig to Kidnap, Assault Passenger
Spencer Pratt Compares Los Angeles' Fashion District to Milan's and It Was Simply...
Algae Can Only Survive Off What Others Create—Just Like the Left
Iran Is Already Denying It Agreed to Nuclear Inspections
Talarico Offends Christians Yet Again by Claiming He 'Hates' Christianity
Guess Who Just Endorsed Graham Platner. The Irony Is Real.
MLB Commissioner Backs Off Warning to Giants Players Over 'Pride Night' Bible Verses
Tipsheet

PolitiFact Gave Pelosi a 'Pants on Fire' Rating. Here's Why.

PolitiFact Gave Pelosi a 'Pants on Fire' Rating. Here's Why.
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

An appeals court on Wednesday ruled that more than 200,000 registered voters could be purged from the Wisconsin database because they have moved. Election officials believe these people might have moved because they changed their address at the local post office, registered vehicles at a new address or provided a new address to some other government agency, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported. 

Advertisement

The State of Wisconsin sent letters in October to roughly 234,000 people asking them to confirm their address or update their voter registration with their new address. 

According to the Elections Commission, 60,000 letters were returned as undeliverable. Another 2,300 people confirmed they still lived at their address and roughly 16,500 registered to vote at their new address. 

Those who failed to take action would be purged from the voter rolls beginning in 2021. 

The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, however, brought about the lawsuit, saying the state needed to take action earlier. The judge agreed and ruled that the state must take action 30 days after notifying the person about being purged from the database. 

When House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) received word of the "alarming" news, she took to Twitter to say voters would be "prohibited from voting" with less than year from the 2020 election. 

PolitiFact, the leftist "fact checking" website, gave her a "pants on fire" rating for her bold-faced lie:

Advertisement

Weighing in on the Wisconsin voter rolls controversy, Pelosi says these 200,000-plus people "will be prohibited from voting."

That’s a major overstatement of how this actually works.

Yes, the pruning process — if allowed by the courts — could potentially remove more than 200,000 people from the voting rolls before the upcoming elections. But there is no punitive element that would ban future voting. Everyone can re-register, even on Election Day.

The use of the word "prohibited," in particular, goes too far, in that it suggests there is no way to vote in the future.

We rate Pelosi’s claim Pants on Fire.

This is another one of those examples where Democrats try to use hysteria to claim there's some kind of voter suppression. And you know if Trump wins Wisconsin in 2020, which is looking more and more likely, the Democrats will claim their voters were "suppressed."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement