Here Are My Predictions for Today's Election
Fox News Had the Most Dangerous Demographic Voice Their Opinion Ahead of the...
No, a CNN Host Did Not Just Say That About MAGA Supporters?
It's Not Shocking That Wikipedia Had to Do This for the 'Gaza Genocide'...
Wait, Bob Menendez's Wife Is Now a Republican?
Escape From New York: Dems Are About to Have a Hell of a...
What Election Day Means and Doesn’t
Former Vice President Dick Cheney Dead at 84
Three-Time Oscar Nominee Diane Ladd Dies at 89
Trump and CBS Bury the Hatchet As He Buries 60 Minutes
Joe Biden Did This: Taliban Makes Life Even Harder for Women in Afghanistan
And What of South Africa?
Tanzanian Agricultural Student Joshua Mollel’s Body Still Held Hostage by Hamas in Gaza
From Homeless Dropout to the Statehouse: The Unbreakable Spirit of Josh Williams
In Defense of Mikey McCoy
Tipsheet

DOJ Refuses To Hold Barr, Ross In Contempt. Here's Why.

AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

The Department of Justice on Wednesday informed Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) they would not hold Attorney General William Barr and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross in contempt of Congress for failing to produce documents related to Congressional subpoenas.

Advertisement

According to Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen, the author of Wednesday's letter, said federal courts realized the sensitivity of documents relating to the Trump administration's decision to ask a citizenship question on the 2020 Census. The documents were privileged, meaning they couldn't be used in civil litigation. 

Despite that, the Oversight Committee received roughly 30,000 pages of documents relating to the policy decision.

"The Department of Justice's long-standing position is that we will not prosecute an official for contempt of Congress for declining to provide information subject to a presidential assertion of executive privilege," Rosen wrote. "Across administrations of both parties, we have consistently adhered to the position that 'the contempt of Congress statute was not intended to apply and could not constitutionally be applied to an Executive Branch official who asserts the President's claim of executive privilege.'"

Advertisement

Rosen cites multiple other instances where Department of Justice officials were not held in contempt for failing to respond to Congressional subpoenas. The most recent example was when the Republican-controlled House attempted to hold then-Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt for failing to to comply with Congressional subpoenas related to Fast and Furious, the gunrunning case that left Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry dead.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement