Whatever Happened to Kilmar?
A New Press Talking Point Dies on Its First Day
Dana Perino's Book on Mentoring Is a Must-Read for Everyone
A Stronger America: President Trump’s First 100 Days
The Democrats' Pickle
Executive Authority on National Security Trumps Judicial Activism
Prabowo, Indonesia’s Sovereign Wealth Fund & Its Private Sector Prowess
President Trump Is Slashing Regulation. He Can Also Greatly Improve the Quality of...
Accountability Could Be Just a Matter of Time
No Exceptions: Trump Admin Strikes Down Calls to Extend Real ID Deadline
Rubio Slams Misleading Headline About American Kids Being Deported
These Mega-Corporations Are Pulling Out of Financially Supporting Pride Month
Democrat Town Halls Targeting GOP Rep Implode Into In-Fighting and Mockery
Trump Prepares to Sign Executive Order Mandating English for Truck Drivers
Rep. Stefanik Nearly Tied With Dem Gov. Hochul in Hypothetical 2026 Matchup
Tipsheet

DOJ Refuses To Hold Barr, Ross In Contempt. Here's Why.

AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

The Department of Justice on Wednesday informed Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) they would not hold Attorney General William Barr and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross in contempt of Congress for failing to produce documents related to Congressional subpoenas.

Advertisement

According to Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen, the author of Wednesday's letter, said federal courts realized the sensitivity of documents relating to the Trump administration's decision to ask a citizenship question on the 2020 Census. The documents were privileged, meaning they couldn't be used in civil litigation. 

Despite that, the Oversight Committee received roughly 30,000 pages of documents relating to the policy decision.

"The Department of Justice's long-standing position is that we will not prosecute an official for contempt of Congress for declining to provide information subject to a presidential assertion of executive privilege," Rosen wrote. "Across administrations of both parties, we have consistently adhered to the position that 'the contempt of Congress statute was not intended to apply and could not constitutionally be applied to an Executive Branch official who asserts the President's claim of executive privilege.'"

Advertisement

Rosen cites multiple other instances where Department of Justice officials were not held in contempt for failing to respond to Congressional subpoenas. The most recent example was when the Republican-controlled House attempted to hold then-Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt for failing to to comply with Congressional subpoenas related to Fast and Furious, the gunrunning case that left Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry dead.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement