The Death of Cross-Examination
CNN Guest Has Found This Narrative to Be Supremely Boring...and That Was Just...
Here's Another Lib Female Meltdown...and It's a Doozy
Bloomberg Reporter Caught Giving Marco Rubio the Finger During Presser With Hungarian PM
You Won't Believe What the Iranian Regime Did to Citizens Attending a 16-Year-Old...
D.C. Water Manager Gadis Once Praised City's Diverse Executives. How's That Working Out...
Thomas Massie, Who Loves to Talk About His 'Principles,' Just Made Quite the...
Schrödinger's Trans Women
Check Out How Nashville Jacked Up Property Taxes for One Local Business
This North Carolina Republican Believes His Home Was Targeted in a Drive-By Shooting
Olympian Who Bashed Trump Over LGBTQ Rights Is Out of Medal Contention
Mamdani's Solution to City's Budget Shortfall Is Exactly What You'd Expect
Anti-ICE Groups Have Found a New Way to 'Resist' Federal Immigration Laws
JD Vance Mocks AOC’s Munich Meltdown: 'The Most Uncomfortable 20 Seconds of Television...
Kevin O'Leary Blasts CNN Panel Over Mamdani’s Tax Hike: 'You're All Nuts'
Tipsheet

DOJ Refuses To Hold Barr, Ross In Contempt. Here's Why.

DOJ Refuses To Hold Barr, Ross In Contempt. Here's Why.
AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

The Department of Justice on Wednesday informed Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) they would not hold Attorney General William Barr and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross in contempt of Congress for failing to produce documents related to Congressional subpoenas.

Advertisement

According to Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen, the author of Wednesday's letter, said federal courts realized the sensitivity of documents relating to the Trump administration's decision to ask a citizenship question on the 2020 Census. The documents were privileged, meaning they couldn't be used in civil litigation. 

Despite that, the Oversight Committee received roughly 30,000 pages of documents relating to the policy decision.

"The Department of Justice's long-standing position is that we will not prosecute an official for contempt of Congress for declining to provide information subject to a presidential assertion of executive privilege," Rosen wrote. "Across administrations of both parties, we have consistently adhered to the position that 'the contempt of Congress statute was not intended to apply and could not constitutionally be applied to an Executive Branch official who asserts the President's claim of executive privilege.'"

Advertisement

Rosen cites multiple other instances where Department of Justice officials were not held in contempt for failing to respond to Congressional subpoenas. The most recent example was when the Republican-controlled House attempted to hold then-Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt for failing to to comply with Congressional subpoenas related to Fast and Furious, the gunrunning case that left Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry dead.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos