Our Goal Is Victory
This Woman Brokered Arms Deals for Iran – Now She's Facing Decades in...
Trump Just Gave Cuba Two Weeks to Get Its Act Together
Kash Patel Vows Arrests Are Coming for Those Who Rigged 2020 Election
Elizabeth Warren Says the Dem With the Nazi Tattoo Is 'Her Kind of...
Lawyer for Man Who Murdered DHS Employee Asks for Bond, Says Her Client...
Ilhan Omar Blames 'Accounting Error' for Massive Revision of Her Wealth
This Is the Real Looming Healthcare Crisis
Connecticut Just Passed a Tough New ID Law, but Not for Voting
'60 Minutes' Just Made a Pretty Big Admission About Iran
Nebraska School District Urges 'Buddy System' After Man Accused of Chasing Young Girls...
Companies Can Now Begin Applying for Tariff Refunds With Costs Expected to Exceed...
Ro Khanna Doubles Down When Asked If He Really Thinks Obama's Leadership on...
Jonathan Turley Levels Democrats for Vowing to Impeach Trump Again
Nick Shirley Confronts CA Legislators Over the New 'Stop Nick Shirley Act'
Tipsheet

DOJ Refuses To Hold Barr, Ross In Contempt. Here's Why.

DOJ Refuses To Hold Barr, Ross In Contempt. Here's Why.
AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

The Department of Justice on Wednesday informed Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) they would not hold Attorney General William Barr and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross in contempt of Congress for failing to produce documents related to Congressional subpoenas.

Advertisement

According to Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen, the author of Wednesday's letter, said federal courts realized the sensitivity of documents relating to the Trump administration's decision to ask a citizenship question on the 2020 Census. The documents were privileged, meaning they couldn't be used in civil litigation. 

Despite that, the Oversight Committee received roughly 30,000 pages of documents relating to the policy decision.

"The Department of Justice's long-standing position is that we will not prosecute an official for contempt of Congress for declining to provide information subject to a presidential assertion of executive privilege," Rosen wrote. "Across administrations of both parties, we have consistently adhered to the position that 'the contempt of Congress statute was not intended to apply and could not constitutionally be applied to an Executive Branch official who asserts the President's claim of executive privilege.'"

Advertisement

Rosen cites multiple other instances where Department of Justice officials were not held in contempt for failing to respond to Congressional subpoenas. The most recent example was when the Republican-controlled House attempted to hold then-Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt for failing to to comply with Congressional subpoenas related to Fast and Furious, the gunrunning case that left Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry dead.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement