Speaker Johnson Blows the Lid Off the Dems' Schumer Shutdown Theater
This Israeli Hostage Says His Hamas Captors Weren’t Who You Think
Supreme Court Rejects Alex Jones' Request to Set Aside $1.4 Billion Verdict
The Schumer Shutdown Continues: Senate Dems Once Again Refuse to Open the Government
New Study Shows 'Trans Identification' Among Youth Is in a Freefall
If Europe Halted Muslim and African Migration, the Number of Sexual Assaults Would...
Batten Down the Hatches: White House Office of Management and Budget Prepared to...
US Ambassador Mike Huckabee Shows Off Musical Chops With Israeli Spin on Lynyrd...
President Trump Authorized Another Strike on Venezuelan Narco Terrorist Boat
Stop the UN Global Climate Tax on American Ships
Bolivian 'Right-Wing' Candidate Mocks Trump, Considers Amnesty for Socialist Criminal
Charlie Kirk Posthumously Awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom
President Trump Declines to Commit to Two-State Solution, Says His Focus Is on...
Naked and Afraid: Portland Protesters Strip Down to Oppose President Trump
Hamas Executes Rivals in Gaza As World Leaders Declare the War Over
Tipsheet

DOJ Refuses To Hold Barr, Ross In Contempt. Here's Why.

AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

The Department of Justice on Wednesday informed Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) they would not hold Attorney General William Barr and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross in contempt of Congress for failing to produce documents related to Congressional subpoenas.

Advertisement

According to Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen, the author of Wednesday's letter, said federal courts realized the sensitivity of documents relating to the Trump administration's decision to ask a citizenship question on the 2020 Census. The documents were privileged, meaning they couldn't be used in civil litigation. 

Despite that, the Oversight Committee received roughly 30,000 pages of documents relating to the policy decision.

"The Department of Justice's long-standing position is that we will not prosecute an official for contempt of Congress for declining to provide information subject to a presidential assertion of executive privilege," Rosen wrote. "Across administrations of both parties, we have consistently adhered to the position that 'the contempt of Congress statute was not intended to apply and could not constitutionally be applied to an Executive Branch official who asserts the President's claim of executive privilege.'"

Advertisement

Rosen cites multiple other instances where Department of Justice officials were not held in contempt for failing to respond to Congressional subpoenas. The most recent example was when the Republican-controlled House attempted to hold then-Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt for failing to to comply with Congressional subpoenas related to Fast and Furious, the gunrunning case that left Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry dead.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement