Legal Expert on Minneapolis ICE Shooting: 'It Was...Obviously a Legally Justified Use of...
Of Course, NYC's Mamdani Weighed in on the Minneapolis ICE Shooting...and Said Something...
Soy Boy Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey's Media Blitzkrieg Over the ICE Shooting Was...
NBC Did Something No Other Outlet Will Likely Do Regarding the ICE Shooting...
Jasmine Crockett Came at JD Vance over Venezuela – Now He's Clapping Back
Here's How Many Vehicle Rammings Incidents ICE Has Faced in the Last Year
The Guy With the Nazi Tattoo Wants to Abolish ICE
The Left Is Not Going to Like What Vice President Vance Had to...
Scott Jennings Nails It: Democrats Radicalized Their Base — and Minneapolis Is Paying...
Flashback: Jill Biden Once Praised Minnesota's Massive Daycare Spending
Hilton Hotels Officially Pulls the Plug on Rogue Minneapolis Location
Blame Democrats
Somali Daycare Owner Flips Out When Citizen Journalists Show Up
Walz and Frey: We CHOOSE Violence
Venezuelan Streets Flooded With Armed Gangs As Maduro's Regime Cracks Down on Supporters...
Tipsheet

DOJ Refuses To Hold Barr, Ross In Contempt. Here's Why.

AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

The Department of Justice on Wednesday informed Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) they would not hold Attorney General William Barr and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross in contempt of Congress for failing to produce documents related to Congressional subpoenas.

Advertisement

According to Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen, the author of Wednesday's letter, said federal courts realized the sensitivity of documents relating to the Trump administration's decision to ask a citizenship question on the 2020 Census. The documents were privileged, meaning they couldn't be used in civil litigation. 

Despite that, the Oversight Committee received roughly 30,000 pages of documents relating to the policy decision.

"The Department of Justice's long-standing position is that we will not prosecute an official for contempt of Congress for declining to provide information subject to a presidential assertion of executive privilege," Rosen wrote. "Across administrations of both parties, we have consistently adhered to the position that 'the contempt of Congress statute was not intended to apply and could not constitutionally be applied to an Executive Branch official who asserts the President's claim of executive privilege.'"

Advertisement

Rosen cites multiple other instances where Department of Justice officials were not held in contempt for failing to respond to Congressional subpoenas. The most recent example was when the Republican-controlled House attempted to hold then-Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt for failing to to comply with Congressional subpoenas related to Fast and Furious, the gunrunning case that left Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry dead.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement