Chris Cuomo Had a Former Leftist Call in to His Show. He Clearly...
This Town Filled Its Coffers With a Traffic Shakedown Scheme – Now They...
Planned Parenthood: Infants Not 'Conscious Beings' and Unlikely to Feel Pain
Democrats Boycotting OpenAI Over Support for Trump
Roy Cooper Dodges Tough Questions About His Deadly Soft-on-Crime Policies
Axios Is Back With Another Ridiculous Anti-Trump Headline
In Historic Deregulatory Move, Trump Officially Revokes Obama-Era Endangerment Finding
Sen. Bernie Moreno Just Exposed Keith Ellison's Open Borders Hypocrisy
Another Career Criminal Killed a Beloved Figure Skating Coach in St. Louis
Colorado Democrats Want to Trample First, Second Amendments With Latest Bill
White House Religious Liberty Commission Member Removed After Hijacking Antisemitism Heari...
Federal Judge Blocks Pete Hegseth From Reducing Sen. Mark Kelly's Pay Over 'Seditious...
AG Pam Bondi Vows to Prosecute Threats Against Lawmakers, Even Across Party Lines
Senate Hearing Erupts After Josh Hawley Lays Out Why Keith Ellison Belongs in...
2 Pakistani Nationals Charged in $10M Medicare Fraud Scheme
Tipsheet

Massachusetts Lawmakers Pass ‘NASTY Women Act’ to Protect Abortion

Massachusetts Lawmakers Pass ‘NASTY Women Act’ to Protect Abortion

In response to fears of Roe v. Wade being overturned, Massachusetts state lawmakers have passed a 'NASTY Women Act’ that will repeal a 173-year-old law banning abortion in the state.

Advertisement

“I think people are beginning to realize these are strange times we live in,” said Massachusetts State Senate President Harriette Chandler.

“Nothing is impossible, and we’ve got to have a ‘plan B.’ If these laws are enforced, what do we do? We’re not willing to sit back and say, ‘Well, it’s not going to happen here.’ The word for that is denial.”

Although abortion is legal in the United States, Chandler introduced the NASTY Women Act (Negating Archaic Statutes Targeting Young Women bill) in January in order to prevent the state from reinforcing the law in the event that Roe v. Wade is overturned.

Massachusetts governor Charlie Baker (R-MA) said he plans to sign the bill into law.

“We will sign that,” he told reporters Monday.

“There are many folks in the women’s health community that were particularly concerned about this. The lieutenant governor and I and other folks on our team discussed it, and we do plan to sign it.”

In light of President Trump’s nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court of the United States, critics are concerned that Roe v. Wade is coming to an end.

“The changing dynamics of the Supreme Court is a real and legitimate concern,” said Claire Cronin, House chair of the Joint Committee on the Judiciary in Massachusetts.

“We have both a president and a vice president who have expressed an intent to overturn Roe v. Wade, and we take them at their word.”

However, some evangelical leaders say that simply overturning Roe v. Wade at the Supreme Court level would not end abortion entirely.

Advertisement

“What people don’t understand is that if you overturn Roe v. Wade, all that does is give the states the right to decide whether abortion is legal or illegal,” said Rev. Jerry Falwell Jr.

“My guess is that there’d probably be less than 20 states that would make abortion illegal if given that right. In the 70s, I don’t know how many states had abortion illegal before Roe v. Wade, but it won’t be near as many this time.”

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) wrote Tuesday that Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s “public record demonstrates hostility towards contraception and abortion,” and that if he is confirmed to the SCOTUS, “he will work to overturn Roe.”

“President Trump’s hostility to women is no secret, and his selection of Judge Kavanaugh to join the Court is just the most recent in his long line of attacks on reproductive freedom. But this attack is particularly dangerous because as a Supreme Court Justice, Judge Kavanaugh would be able to affect policy for a lot longer than a four-year Presidential term.”

“America can’t go back to an era of back-alley abortions and can’t move into a future where reproductive rights are restricted,” the senator warned.

“It’s time for Americans to raise their voices, flood the halls of the Senate, work the phone lines, and tell the President and the Senate: no to Judge Kavanaugh.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos