The VRA Is No Longer a DEI Program for Bad Democrat Policies

And others are saying it's the end of black representation in Congress. Of course, as Marc Randazza points out, the Republicans nominated a Black woman for governor in Virginia, have a Black Senator in South Carolina, and deeply respect Justice Clarence Thomas. But they're our representatives not because of their race, but because they best represent our values, our political philosophy, and our style of governance.

Democrats are claiming there will be no more black representation

Meanwhile, the Republican nominee for governor in Virginia was a Black immigrant. The Republican senator from South Carolina is Black, our favorite Justice is Black

So what’s the truth?

— Marc J. Randazza 🇺🇸 🇮🇹 🇧🇷 (@marcorandazza) April 29, 2026

Senator Ralph Warnock said this was an undoing of the legacy of Martin Luther King, Jr. Because he was notorious for wanting people judged and gerrymandered by the color of their skin and not the whole "content of character" thing.

Trump’s Supreme Court has gutted the protections that Dr. King marched for.

The protections made possible by civil rights protestors who spilled blood in pursuit of a more perfect union.

This is a devastating and profound step backwards for American Democracy.

— Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock (@SenatorWarnock) April 29, 2026

As someone pointed out, Warnock still managed to win his seat in the Deep South despite his claims such a thing will no longer happen.

Martin Luther King marched sixty years ago.

Nothing in the voting rights act change the lines in the state of Georgia.

Yet you--a very black man--won a statewide election in the very Deep South. https://t.co/eyXKHGFRHK

— Tweetoleon (@Tweetoleon) April 29, 2026

Here I'd also like to point out that Barack Obama won not once, but twice. While he didn't win the majority of white voters, he did win the majority of younger white voters, and by a healthy margin. That would not happen in a country that wasn't open to the idea of "black representation," however you want to define it. Instead, recall that in 2008 Obama ran a more conservative campaign than John McCain did. Some of us — myself included — knew it was a bait-and-switch, but a lot of voters believed in hope and change. Despite how awful his policies turned out to be and how they've had lasting negative repercussions, the fact remains that voters (at the time) felt he offered them something beyond his skin color.

Recommended

Some Real Talk About the Iran Deal Kurt Schlichter

Related:

DEMOCRAT PARTY GERRYMANDERING SUPREME COURT DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION

Circling back to what Hakeem Jeffries said, the Supreme Court has knocked down all the pillars of DEI precisely because they are unconstitutional. They violate equal rights, advocate for discrimination, and create a deeply divided country. The Democrats thrive on that divisiveness, of course. Keeping us segregated into racial, sexual, or political groups is their divide-and-conquer strategy. Now that they're losing their tool of political conquest, they're panicking.

But what voters want is someone who understands and resonates with them. That's why President Trump made inroads with Black and Hispanic voters. After decades of Democrats taking them for granted, someone came along who saw them as more than guaranteed blue votes. Any politician, regardless of skin color, can win with a message that reaches voters and transcends DEI. But what Democrats are saying about their electoral prospects now is what they've said about DEI in all facets of life: unqualified people can't get ahead unless we help them and our unpopular ideas don't gain traction unless we rig the system to their advantage.

Perhaps its time to run better candidates and better ideas beyond "Orange Man Bad" and then the Democrats won't need racial gerrymandering to help them win.