Why the White House Press Briefings Could Get Nuts When Karoline Leavitt Takes...
Patty Murray Just Made a Ridiculous Claim About Democrats Defunding ICE
Trump Administration Launches Civil Rights Investigation Into New York City's Department o...
On WHCA Weekend, Substack Celebrates ‘Independent Journalism’ by Trotting Out Castoff Corp...
The NY Times Tries and Fails to Gin Up Sympathy for Laid Off...
The Official Democrat X Account Tried Deleting Its Tweet Attacking Hung Cao...but There...
J.K. Rowling Offers Support After Trans Assault in Scottish Women’s Prison Sparks Backlash
Democrats Can't Distance Themselves From Hasan Piker Now
A North Carolina School Superintendent Sees Nothing Wrong With This LGTBQ Book for...
The Department of Justice Announces It's Bringing Back Death by Firing Squad in...
The Trump Administration Announces a New Round of Negotiations As Iran Begs for...
Iran Activates Retired 30-Year-Old Super Tanker As They Run Out of Places to...
Leading CA Gov Candidate Says US Should've Been More Aggressive on Asylum, Blames...
This GOP Rep Is Calling for the Pardon of the Special Forces Soldier...
Tipsheet

U.S. Court of Appeals Just Dealt Trump Administration a Blow on Asylum Claims

U.S. Court of Appeals Just Dealt Trump Administration a Blow on Asylum Claims
AP Photo/Eugene Garcia, File

The U.S. Court of Appeals in D.C. just issued a ruling upholding a decision by Obama-appointed Judge Randolph Moss that blocks the Trump administration from denying asylum claims to aliens who cross our border illegally.

Advertisement

The highlighted portion reads:

The INA does not allow the President to remove Plaintiffs under summary removal procedures of his own making. Nor does it allow the Executive to suspend the Plaintiffs' right to apply for asylum, deny Plaintiffs' access to withholding of removal under the INA, or curtail mandatory procedures for adjudicating Plaintiffs' Convention against Torture claims.

Here's more:

An appeals court on Friday blocked President Donald Trump’s executive order suspending asylum access, a key pillar of the Republican president’s plan to crack down on migration at the southern border of the U.S.

A three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit found that immigration laws give people the right to apply for asylum at the border, and the president can’t circumvent that.

ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt said in a statement that the appellate ruling is “essential for those fleeing danger who have been denied even a hearing to present asylum claims under the Trump administration’s unlawful and inhumane executive order.”

The opinion was written by Judge J. Michelle Childs, who was nominated to the bench by Democratic President Joe Biden. Judge Justin Walker, a Trump nominee, wrote a partial dissent. Judge Cornelia Pillard, who was nominated by Democratic President Barack Obama, also heard the case.

Advertisement

Anyone who crosses the border has traveled through multiple countries in which they could request asylum. 

As Townhall reported last week, lawyers are coaching asylum seekers to lie about being gay to make asylum claims.

This case will likely go before the Supreme Court, as have other asylum and immigration-related cases.

Editor’s Note: Thanks to President Trump, illegal immigration into our great country has virtually stopped. Despite the radical left's lies, new legislation wasn't needed to secure our border, just a new president.

Help us continue to report the truth about the president's border policies and mass deportations. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement