Australia Is What Happens When You Disarm Your Citizens
Oh, We Know What the Brown University Shooter Reportedly Said Before Opening Fire
To the Shock of No One, Australian PM Says Bondi Terrorists Motivated by...
If You Were Hoping That Trump Would Tone Down His Remarks on Rob...
Nice Try, Dems, But Your Little Stunt Against Kristi Noem Last Week Imploded...
When One Seeks Updates on the Brown University Shooting, It Shouldn't Devolve Like...
And We Had Another Brown University Shooting Presser That Went Totally Off the...
It’s Not Hard to NOT Be a Jerk
This Is What 'Globalize the Intifada' Looks Like: Orthodox Jews Attacked on NYC...
The U.S. Just Conducted Another Lethal Kinetic Strike on Narco Boats
The (Non-Christmas) Lists
Tell Me Why We Lie to Ourselves
The Destructive Force Enabling Mayhem
Dreaming of a White Christmas
Outlawing Extremist Islam Is the Answer
Tipsheet

Elissa Slotkin Was Asked About Trump's 'Illegal' Orders...Then Things Got Awkward

AP Photo/Mike Householder

Last week, Senator Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) and other Democrats shared a video directed at members of the military and intelligence communities. In that video, they said our armed forces have an obligation to disobey "illegal orders" given by President Trump and his administration.

Advertisement

President Trump called them out for it, and rightly noted the penalties for sedition and treason can include a death sentence. The Democrats, who just essentially called for a military coup against a duly elected President, responded to that factual statement by Trump as "proof" that he was calling for political violence against them.

Now, Slotkin went on ABC and admitted the President has not issued any illegal orders.

"To my knowledge, I am not aware of things that are illegal, but certainly there are some legal gymnastics that are going on with these Caribbean strikes and everything related to Venezuela," Slotkin said.

Advertisement

The legacy media isn't dumb. They know precisely what Slotkin and her colleagues meant by "illegal orders" — orders Democrats don't like. And those Democrats were fine with men and women of our military facing serious consequences under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), which can include the death penalty for treasonous behavior.

No one believes the Democrats would "have their backs" because Congress cannot change the outcome of a court-martial. A President could, in theory, pardon or commute a sentence handed down by the military, but that's a heck of a gamble. What if a Democrat doesn't win in 2028 or 2032? Is Slotkin expecting a member of the military to spend the next decade in prison so Democrats can brag they resisted Trump?

Vice President J.D. Vance reminded Slotkin and friends that what they did was, in fact, illegal.

Advertisement

There should be consequences for this.

We all know precisely what the purpose of this.

And that's exactly it.

Editor’s Note: Every single day, here at Townhall, we will stand up and FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT against the radical left and deliver the conservative reporting our readers deserve.

Help us continue to tell the truth about the Trump administration and its successes. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement