Democrats Are Walking Into a Minefield
Secret Service Director Says Threats Against Trump and Other Protectees Are 'Off the...
So That's Why Some Crazed Migrant Executed Three People in Minnesota?
Sophie Cunningham Shuts Down Reporter Over Her Stance on Transgender Athletes in Women's...
Government Needs to Think Before It Acts
Turns Out New Jersey's Voter Fraud Hurts Immigrants, Too
New NRCC Ad Blasts Socialist Amish Shah As Dangerous for Arizona Families
Troy Jackson Is Graham Platner Lite
Play-Acting to Destruction
Trump's War Critics Discuss Everything — Except the Point
Why the Debate Over Life-Saving Vehicles?
Break Google’s Monopoly for Good
Save Our Elections to SAVE America
How Did America Get to the Threshold of Normalizing Sedition?
When Seniority Becomes a Substitute for Statesmanship
OPINION

Candidates Show G.O.P. Less United on Goals of War

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Candidates Show G.O.P. Less United on Goals of War

DERRY, N.H. — The hawkish consensus on national security that has dominated Republican foreign policy for the last decade is giving way to a more nuanced view, with some presidential candidates expressing a desire to withdraw from Afghanistan as quickly as possible and suggesting that the United States has overreached in Libya.

Advertisement

The shift, while incremental so far, appears to mark a separation from a post-Sept. 11 posture in which Republicans were largely united in supporting an aggressive use of American power around the world. A new debate over the costs and benefits of deploying the military reflects the length of the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, the difficulty of building functional governments and the financial burden at home in a time of extreme fiscal pressure.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement