This Image Says Everything About Trump's White House Correspondents' Association Dinner Sp...
Wait, Is Troy Jackson Eligible to Replace Graham Platner?
How This State Is Starting to Comply With the New Mood Over Election...
Former MSNBC Analyst Admits Republicans Were Right About This Regarding Our Elections
GOP Sends Letter to NJ Governor: What the Hell Happened to Your Voter...
Democrats Do Not Speak for All Women
On National Parents’ Day, Remember: Parents—Not the State—Know and Love Their Children Bes...
The Unlikely Incubators of Liberty
FBI Captures Its Fourth Most Wanted in Five Weeks
Twelve Indicted in Alleged $2 Million Nike Cargo Theft Conspiracy in Memphis
Four Men Plead Guilty in $2.2 Million Medicaid Fraud Scheme
Troy Jackson Crowned As New Maine Senate Nominee
We Now Have the Truth About That Viral ICE Story That Sparked Massive...
The Process to Replace Graham Platner Is Already Off to a Rough Start...
The Conservative Case for American Cement
OPINION

Zuckerberg Says He Regrets Censorship, So Why Is Meta Still Trying to Interfere With the Election?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Zuckerberg Says He Regrets Censorship, So Why Is Meta Still Trying to Interfere With the Election?
AP Photo/Michael Dwyer, File

We know that Facebook censored people throughout the pandemic. We know that if the Biden administration asked them to censor people, the social media giant did it.

Advertisement

This isn't groundbreaking news.

Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg said he regrets that the company did it, which is fine except that it could be argued that it constituted election interference. After all, a lot of the people who reported being censored were shut down because of their pro-Donald Trump rhetoric.

The same is true for those who report being throttled on the platform.

But Zuckerberg said that's over. He said he regrets it and it won't happen again, blah, blah, blah.

Now, let's go back four years earlier. Remember when it was a massive scandal because some pages on Facebook were reportedly set up by Russia to try and get Donald Trump elected? Granted, they were really just about creating discord, but they basically pushed memes, and that was election interference, at least as Democrats saw it.

Which brings me to today.

Now, what I'm about to get into is just one man's experiences, namely my own, but I can't help but notice something funny happening at Facebook.

I follow right-leaning pages and non-political pages related to my various interests. Some of those are meme pages, but they're apolitical unless the politics involve the area of interest specifically.

Advertisement

Yet, in the last few weeks, I've been getting more and more left-leaning content in my feed, and always from pages and groups that I don't follow, have no real overlap with any areas of interest, or anything of the sort.

Normally, I just hide everything from that group, but when I realized how bad it was, I started to figure I needed to get a screenshot of at least one example.

Yeah, it's hardly the most egregious thing I've ever seen and it's not even the first time I've seen it. Some of my left-leaning friends think this is terribly clever for some reason.

Note the word "Follow" in the image next to the page's name. That's a clear indicator that this isn't something I've sought out. This showed up in my feed as something I should like, yet it has almost nothing to do with anything I've shared, commented on, posted, or anything of the sort.

There hasn't been a single one of these from the right. No libertarianism or conservative rhetoric in meme form from pages I'd never heard of and don't actively follow. Only from the left.

Based on how people reacted to things back in 2016, this should be defined as attempted election interference.

Advertisement

It won't work on me or millions of others, but the thing about this is that it doesn't have to work in a vacuum. Consumers get this in their feeds, leftist content on television, leftist rhetoric in their music, and pretty much everywhere else they look. It starts to infest their brains and slowly shifts their thinking and they don't even realize it. They simply don't know there are alternative points of view.

Zuckerberg may feel awful about caving to censorship demands, but I'm not seeing a lot of evidence he won't try to influence things in a completely different way.

It's possible I'm reading too much into this, but I doubt it.

Zuckerberg's operation is still playing games with our political process. It’s just doing it differently this time around.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement