Flashback: That Time a White Lib Woman Said She Loved That Her Unofficial...
Lefty Temu Gaylord Focker Nurse Reportedly Fired Over Unhinged Anti-ICE Videos
Nothing Says 'I'm Crazy' More Than Rich, Gated-Community Libs Raging About ICE
If You Get Your Morals From Musicians, You’re Probably a Moron
The Choices That We Make
A Test of Wills
Tax the Dog (Walker)
Billie Hellish
Alberta Pays More, Gets Less—and Performs Better
Winter Storm Fern and the Quiet Strength That Holds the Nation Together
Russia Will Go for It All in Ukraine in 2026, and Lose
A Major Win for Trafficking Survivors and a Chance to Do More
Canada Played Dirty to Keep This American Out of the Olympics. Was It...
Bill and Hillary Clinton Reverse Course and Will Testify in Front of Congress
CNN Disgustingly Glorifies Teenage 'ICE Watchers' in New Story
OPINION

Will CBS News Go 'Unwoke' on 'Gender-Expansive' Lingo?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
AP Photo/Mark Lennihan

The British socialist newspaper The Guardian is upset that CBS News might become less radical, publishing an article provocatively titled "'Blood in the water': Bari Weiss's chaotic first three months in charge of CBS News."

Advertisement

This spin announces an agenda: Weiss Must Be Stopped! The Left cannot stand any outlet on their side moving two degrees toward the center. Any tiptoe to the middle is "anti-journalism." Any hint at an opposing conservative view is a slippery slope to "misinformation."

Guardian "media & power reporter" Jeremy Barr quoted a pile of anonymous CBS staffers in service to his anti-Weiss agenda. He referred in this story to a previously unreported Nov. 6 "blow-up among staffers about language choices when writing about transgender individuals."

A "prominent correspondent" – which Semafor reporter Maxwell Tani claimed was legal correspondent Jan Crawford – sent an email that said CBS "should refrain from adopting terminology advocated by the movement," referring to guidance from the Trans Journalists Association's stylebook.

A producer responded angrily to the email, writing: "It's a TJA style 'guide' - that's what I'm trying to do. Guide us to better coverage." They define "better" as "accepted by our ideological allies."

Now this is where the rubber meets the road. Wokeness dominates the elitist media. "Style books" are surrender manuals to ideological manipulation of terminology. Facts are shredded in favor of feelings. So you get Orwellian terms like "gender-affirming care" to describe trying to erase your actual gender.

Advertisement

This is why Barr & Co. hated new CBS anchor Tony Dokoupil's proclamation that "we've taken into account the perspective of advocates and not the average American. Or we put too much weight in the analysis of academics or elites, and not enough on you." Transgender ideology is a perfect example. They believe advocates and elites should tell the undereducated "average American" what to think and how to talk.

The Trans Journalism Association demands that "better" coverage means you avoid any reference to actual biological facts in deference to the transgender imagination. Reality is whatever they decide it is; it's "gender-expansive." So you get instructions like these: "Avoid references to being born female or born a girl, etc." That's too factual.

When it comes to removing breasts or penises, "Terms like 'mutilation,' 'sterilization,' and 'social contagion' invoke common misinformation and disinformation." This is because they are the spreaders of the "social contagion," but hate the description. They hate the term "culture war" because they aim to win it without a real battle.

Don't mention biology. "Noun phrases like biological men, biological males, biological women, or biological females are often used by anti-trans groups to invoke a person's assigned sex at birth as their 'real' gender, in contrast to their gender identity." You have to love "real" in quotes.

Advertisement

Don't say the ideologues are ideological. The term "gender ideology" is described as "a charged term commonly deployed by anti-trans commentators and activists that implies trans people, merely by being trans, are participating in a political activity or have a political agenda."

They are. That's obvious. That's why they are intimidating the media into a political lingo.

Then they double down: "There is no such thing as transgenderism any more than there is a 'gay agenda'; the -ism as used in transgenderism implies that a trans person's gender is a political philosophy, not a demographic characteristic."

But it is obviously a philosophy that seeks to dominate by insisting it's not. Their own messaging on Instagram boasts of "shaping journalism into the industry we deserve" and "transforming the journalism industry" and urging people to "Support the Movement." But don't call it ideological!

Tim Graham is director of media analysis at the Media Research Center and executive editor of the blog NewsBusters.org.

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting and opinion? Support our work by joining Townhall VIP! Use the promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement