The internet has become an indispensable part of American life - and a launch point for more direct, wide-scale global interactions. Despite instances of fraud, manipulation, and endangerment to our population, the American public, via the internet, remains dangerously under-defended by our federal government from bad actors. This lack of attention showcases vulnerabilities in our safety - an inalienable right provided to all Americans.
When Personal Attacks Become National Threats
Among the most direct and insidious cyber threats to emerge in recent years, is the unauthorized sharing of intimate images online, often referred to as “revenge porn.” Where once a private matter between jaded and manipulative former partners, this form of abuse has grown into a prospectively serious national security concern. No longer reserved for elected officials and corporate tycoons in directed blackmail scenarios, but with the wide-spread access to AI and image generation software, the threat has now reached the doorstep of average Americans.
The Take It Down Act: A Bipartisan Response to a Modern Crisis
Following an overwhelming bipartisan vote in the House, something not often seen in 2025, the Take It Down Act, sponsored by Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) brought to the House floor by Representative Maria Salazar (R-FL), and championed by First Lady Melania Trump, is now headed to the President’s desk.
Studies of the harm of non-consensual image sharing well-document that women are overwhelmingly the targets of this abuse - 9:1, in fact. The consequences are routinely devastating: careers are destroyed and personal reputations ruined. While those outcomes alone are tragic, this is no longer just a personal crisis - it is a structural vulnerability for our nation and the Take it Down Act is a national security imperative.
Recommended
Closing the Digital Defense Gap
This bill prohibits the non-consensual online publication of intimate photos or AI-generated depictions of individuals, and requires online platforms to promptly remove the depictions upon receiving notice of their existence. Web-based platforms failing to comply will face penalties - marking a long overdue shift in how the U.S. government approaches accountability in the tech sector. Without strong federal protections, states’ patchwork laws, while well-intended, leave millions unprotected. The institution of federal law creates clear, enforceable standards that tech companies must follow. Had this bill not passed, what were to happen when someone with access to impact a vulnerability in our systems, whether cyber, infrastructure, banking, etc., is threatened by the exposure of either their private photos, or digitally generated photos by an adversary, with no set process or recourse to protecting that individual and removing the imagery?
Individuals have increasingly found themselves targeted by digital exploitation campaigns and public access to digital engineering has not been able to catch up to spotting deep fakes. Whether the goal is humiliation, coercion, or destabilization, the weaponization of personal likeness has become a tactic to silence, blackmail, and discredit. Foreign adversaries have shown a willingness to exploit any digital weakness; prior to this act, the absence of a federal standard has made it easier to utilize that exploitation.
With this support, Congress and the Trump administration are sending the message that there is now a precedent and a step in the right direction where American privacy is protected by federal law. This legislation is more than a defense of individual privacy and dignity - its implications reinforce the importance of national resilience in a primarily digital era.
The digital domain is now a battleground. From foreign disinformation, to cyberattacks, Americans face threats not just to their data, but now to their dignity. In a digital environment, the idea that private content can be stolen and disseminated with impunity is more than a morale failure - it is a national vulnerability. The Take It Down Act begins to close that gap.
It also reflects a rarity: bipartisan unity on a modern, complex issue. The bill’s support from both parties underscores that digital safety transcends political ideology - a novel concept for American safety, one would think. First Lady Melanie Trump’s advocacy is helping to bring greater attention to the matter, and shows Americans that leadership on this issue can, and should, come from all sides of the political spectrum.
Protecting Privacy Without Compromising Protected Speech
Importantly, this law does not interfere with constitutionally protected speech - the primary concern of its opponents. The bill targets only a narrow category of harmful content that holds no legitimate public value, and is explicitly distributed without consent. This bill is not about silencing speech - it is about shielding citizens from exploitation - domestically and abroad. Critics argue that the law puts too much responsibility on tech companies, or could invite overreach. However, the reality is that these platforms already hold enormous power over what is seen, and shared, online. With the signing of this bill, expectations and federal consequences will exist - showcasing an essential shift to proactivity in an era where digital harm moves faster than the law.
A Foundation for Future Digital Resilience
As with any legislation, implementation and follow-through will be key. Tech companies must invest in compliance and response systems that are timely and reliable - and which solely target imagery defined in the law.
This legislation should serve as a foundation for future actions, and not the endpoint in our efforts to balance modernization and stewardship of that responsibility. As technology continues to advance, our government, in partnership with the private sector, must treat online privacy as a pillar of strategic defense.
Digital dignity is not a luxury; it is a requirement for a free and secure society. It is not the job of the federal government to police what legal photos you take in the privacy of your home, or who you choose to send those to, but providing protections and regulations for the protection of your data, and your safety, is. By passing the Take it Down Act, Congress has taken a vital step toward reinforcing the safety of our citizens.
The threats we face today are no longer simply physical weapons, they are embedded in code, deployed through screens, and aimed at the fabric of our public life. We must meet these new threats with laws that are enforceable and show a true understanding of the digital environment that we live in.
It is the duty of our government to provide protections for safety, civil dignity, and a strong national resilience - whether on soil or in code.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member