Chris Van Hollen's Latest El Salvador Photo Inadvertently Captured the Dismal State of...
New York Governor Drops Bizarre Line About Eggs Before Easter
Another Major Narrative About That Deported Illegal Alien Just Fell Apart
When the Sky Went Black
Will Harvard Go Full Hillsdale?
End US Taxpayer Support for the Higher Education Gravy Train
Governor Polis Is a Wolf in Libertarian's Clothing
Abrego Garcia’s Wife Attempts to Explain Why She Sought Domestic Violence Restraining Orde...
When Secular Reporters Watch Religious Movies
Democrats' Bizarrely Misplaced Empathy
IRS Data Confirms Trump’s Tax Cuts Delivered Big for the Middle Class
CNN and America
Exclusive: The Man Who Discovered Letitia James' Alleged Fraud Speaks Out
The Greatest Event in Human History
Democrats’ Real Beef Isn’t With Tariffs but Turf
OPINION

A Chance to End Biden’s Federal Overreach in Title Insurance

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

Editor's Note: This column was co-authored by Karla Jones.

President Trump and new U.S. Federal Housing Director Bill Pulte made waves last week by overhauling the boards of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. As they continue to shake up the Federal Housing Financing Agency (FHFA), a leftover Biden Administration scheme presents a perfect opportunity to stop federal overreach and return power to the states. 

Advertisement

During the Biden administration, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) began a program that removes state-regulated, private-sector title insurers from the refinancing process in favor of the federal government. Originally introduced in 2022 under the false premise of reducing the costs of buying a home, the White House promptly dropped the measure in the face of bipartisan opposition on Capitol Hill. Undeterred, President Biden reintroduced the program in his final State of the Union address last March, and it still appears in the 2025-2027 Equitable Housing Finance Plan

This effort presents a fundamental constitutional concern, as it seeks to undermine states’ authority to regulate insurance. When our Founding Fathers devised a governing system for the newly formed United States, determining where federal power ended and where state and local authority began was a signature accomplishment.  

The Tenth Amendment, which provides that “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively or to the people,” was intended to prevent Washington, D.C., from interfering in matters best left to the states. 

As a result, the regulation of insurance – including title insurance – has long been recognized as a state prerogative, protected by statutory frameworks like the McCarran-Ferguson Act. Passed in 1945, the Act explicitly grants states the primary role in overseeing the insurance industry, acknowledging that local officials are best positioned to understand and address the nuances of their respective markets. 

Advertisement

Fourteen state attorneys general reiterated that point in a joint letter to then-FHFA Director Sandra Thompson last July, writing, “Title insurance is a state-regulated industry, and homeowners will be better served if it stays that way.” 

While lawmakers in Washington have contended that the program is risky, Americans should also be concerned with how the program subverts the state-based regulatory system and expands the role of the federal government. Recognition of the FHFA program’s potential to erode federalism is what prompted state legislators who are members of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) to approve the model Resolution Reaffirming Support for the U.S. State-Based System of Title Insurance Regulation in Response to Growing Federal Encroachment

For decades, the federal government respected states’ authority on this issue. However, in announcing by fiat that it intends to eliminate title insurance on certain loans in favor of a federal government approach, President Biden’s FHFA upended that balance. The agency is treading onto state regulators’ territory and essentially turning the Government Sponsored Enterprise Fannie Mae, which cost American taxpayers $200 billion when it was bailed out of the 2008 financial crisis, into a federal title insurer

Advertisement

Indeed, over the last several years, a perfect storm of inflation caused by excessive government spending, low inventory, and high interest rates has driven home prices through the roof and Americans out of the housing market. However, title insurance is not driving this affordability challenge, and removing private-sector insurers at the state level from the real estate market will only create additional costs and risks to homeowners, lenders, and the housing finance system.   

The title insurance industry is already subject to strict oversight by the individual states. Rate regulation varies by state, but most stipulate that title insurance rates may not be excessive, inadequate, or unfairly discriminatory. State insurance regulators have worked to craft and enforce policies that safeguard consumers, maintain market stability, and ensure transparency in title transactions. These policies provide homeowners with assurances that the property is truly theirs.   

As the Trump administration looks for opportunities to curtail the bureaucracy in Washington, D.C., they should address this federal encroachment into title insurance, a sector properly under the purview of the states, putting an end to another ill-informed, Biden-led, federally run program that will hurt consumers and taxpayers. 

Advertisement

 

John Snyder represents the 82nd District in the Florida House of Representatives.

Karla Jones leads the Federalism, International Relations, and Homeland Security Task Force for the American Legislative Exchange Council.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement