CNN's Kaitlan Collins Is Infuriated That No One Cares About Trump Blasting Dems...
Watch Scott Jennings Slaps Down Lib Media Claim That Illegals Won't Get Health...
Wait, a Dem Rep Really Said This About Trump During the Schumer Shutdown
The Latest Sombrero-Mariachi Responses to the Schumer Shutdown Are Gold
No Apologies: Proud to Stand With Israel, Proud to Defend the West
Trump Posted a New Clip Trolling Hakeem Jeffries...and Another That's Really Going to...
Antifa Assaulted Conservative Journalists – Guess Who the Police Arrested
Democrats Thought They Had the Upper Hand in the Schumer Shutdown. WaPo Says...
Qatar Is Bankrolling Global Terror—and It’s a Direct Threat to the West
The Democrats Won’t Shut Down the Government for Long
Vought Announces Freeze on $2.1 Billion for Another Blue City's Infrastructure Projects
Of Course This Happened Just Moments After ‘1984’ Starmer Beach Art Appeared
This 2019 Clip of Democrats Is Coming Back to Haunt Them Amid Shutdown...
Amidst Concerns About Left-Wing Lawfare, States Should Review Who They Have on Contract...
Talking Point vs. Truth
OPINION

Coronavirus Stimulus Would Barely Cover Medicare for All

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

The economic crisis caused by the coronavirus pandemic has prompted the biggest spending spree in American history. The House of Representatives just passed an additional relief package worth $3 trillion. That's on top of $2.2 trillion in spending that Congress and the president green-lit in March -- including $250 billion in expanded unemployment benefits, $300 billion in checks sent directly to individuals, and $150 billion for healthcare providers.

Advertisement

These are massive amounts of money. That historic $2.2 trillion figure is more than half of what the feds expect to collect in taxes this year. It's also roughly half what the federal government would spend on just one year of Medicare for All.

In other words, Medicare for All would command the kind of spending historically associated with once-in-a-generation economic crises each and every year.

Unfortunately, such comparisons are still necessary. Senator Bernie Sanders's presidential campaign may have failed, but more than half of voters still support his plan for a government takeover of health insurance. 

Medicare for All would eliminate private insurance and enroll every American in a government-run plan. These plans would cover everything from checkups and surgeries to dental and long-term care, free of charge. Patients wouldn't face premiums, deductibles, or copays.

Of course, this "free" health care would come with a hefty price tag. Estimates of the 10-year cost of Medicare for All range from about $28 trillion to some $46 trillion.

Not even Medicare for All's supporters have a plan to pay for the program. Sanders has proposed a series of taxes that would generate $17.5 trillion, less than half of the plan's total cost. Even doubling all individual and corporate tax receipts wouldn't generate enough money to cover the cost of Medicare for All.

Advertisement

The plan would trigger an economic crisis of its own by upending the healthcare sector, which accounts for nearly one-fifth of the economy and one of the nation's largest employers. Insurance agents, hospital administrators, and more would be among the more than 2 million people would find themselves out of work practically overnight.

This disruption would make it harder for patients to access care. Medicare for All would reduce hospital revenues by around $150 billion. That would put the futures of many hospitals in jeopardy, especially those in small, rural areas, whose margins are already thin. Over 100 rural hospitals closed their doors in the past decade, and 25 percent remain at high risk of closure.

Medicare for All would also deliver significant pay cuts to doctors. The plan envisions paying doctors at Medicare's existing rates, which are projected to be 40 percent lower than those paid by private insurance, according to the Mercatus Center's Charles Blahous.

Those pay cuts could exacerbate the country's looming doctor shortage. Based on current trends, the United States will be short 120,000 doctors by 2032, according to the Association of American Medical Colleges. If aging doctors were to respond to Medicare for All's lower pay by retiring early, or if lower compensation discourages young people from entering the profession, then that number could be even higher.

Advertisement

The COVID-19 outbreak has destroyed trillions of dollars in wealth and saddled future taxpayers with trillions more in obligations. One can only hope that the pandemic will end up being a once-in-a-lifetime event. Medicare for All would bring this kind of financial destruction to the economy and patients each and every year.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement