Whether today’s White House Summit on Digital Assets proves seminally important to the future of America, time will tell, but at the very least it was a welcomed radical departure from the Biden Administration’s openly hostile stance toward the crypto industry.
Many were disappointed when the live feed abruptly cut off shortly after roundtable attendees, including Trump’s AI and Crypto Czar, David Sacks, began the more substantive discussion points, but it was clear from the onset this summit was intended to mark a new era for digital assets and industry innovation. The room included the top names and biggest innovators in the industry like Brian Armstrong, the Winklevoss Twins, and Brad Garlinghouse.
Aside from Trump calling Bitcoin the “digital gold” and lauding yesterday’s announcement to establish a national Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, the most interesting moment in his remarks came when he told the group his administration would be ending “the Fed’s war on crypto” which resulted in the targeted debanking of individuals involved in or associated with cryptocurrencies.
Trump has faced intense criticism about his crypto policy positions, but it was telling he seemed to identify with the people and companies who were unfairly targeted and persecuted by the Biden Administration for seemingly political reasons. For all the talk about crypto birdies chirping in his ear about why he should take the mantle as America’s first crypto president, he clearly relates to the targeting and unfairness the crypto and blockchain industry has faced since he left office.
What today’s summit really represents is an inflection point in America’s time horizon to seize the high ground as a global leader in blockchain technology and digital asset innovation. It’s true most Americans are still unfamiliar with cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology, let alone how they want their government to regulate it. According to Cap Hill Crypto, the prominent DC-based policy newsletter, there are at least five pieces of key legislation in Congress which dovetail many of the summit’s discussion points.
According to data from Cygnal, 65 percent of likely 2026 voters support regulating existing cryptocurrencies. Not a single demographic dropped below 52 percent support for regulating the industry. Part of Trump’s aim with today’s summit was to kick off a new industry-friendly approach to right-sized regulation that clarifies rules and protects their ability to compete and innovate.
But the crypto industry as a whole faces significant consumer adoption and PR headwinds. More data from Cygnal shows only 12 percent of Americans currently own cryptocurrencies while 25 percent say they don’t currently own any assets but would consider purchasing some in the future.
Before President Trump’s announcement to establish a Bitcoin reserve, Cygnal’s data from their monthly National Voter Trends (NVT) survey showed 17 percent supported legislation to establish the strategic reserve while 45 percent said they were either unsure or didn’t support or oppose such a legislative effort.
However, hidden in that data is a unique group of voters. Those who voted for Biden in 2020 but converted to Trump in 2024 - 45 percent - support legislation to establish the Bitcoin reserve. This group almost doubled the support among Republicans and Trump 2024 voters. Call it reading the tea leaves but here again Trump shows a remarkable ability to choose winning positions on an array of issues regardless of whether the mainstream deems it impractical or niche.
Of course, not everyone is on board and it’s not just Democrats. Some bloggers, podcasters, and social media personalities took to X to rag on the summit as a scheme to pump their prices and ingratiate the industry to the world’s most popular person.
However, these critics are loud voices and often early crypto adopters who spent years in the crypto wilderness facing skeptics and struggling to push the adoption and use case arguments (of which there are hundreds if not thousands) forward. And they also developed a strong anti-government sentiment as part of their identity as a digital asset champion.
But therein lies the rub: critics of Trump’s summit, seeing today’s roundtable as a shill for government control, fail to acknowledge the industry’s growth, influence, and technological implications necessitate a governmental approach. How can we ever fully realize the applications of Bitcoin, as its use in peer-to-peer transactions, payments, or a store of value, if we do not have a government willing to accept its framework? Shall we forever banish ourselves to the fringes, like the Left, and commit more to a narrative of oppression or shall we help bring the power of Bitcoin, decentralized currencies, and blockchain tech to the forefront of the only nation on earth who is responsible for more advancements of humanity and freedom than any other?
Put it that way and the choice is clear. Put it Trump’s way and it’s even better: “We’re like pioneers.”
Join the conversation as a VIP Member