Post-Assad Syrian Christians Rise Up to Celebrate Christmas
The Details Are in on How the Feds Are Blowing Your Tax Dollars
Here's the Final Tally on How Much Money Trump Raised for Hurricane Victims
Since When Did We Republicans Start Being Against Punishing Criminals?
Poll Shows Americans Are Hopeful For 2025, and the Reason Why Might Make...
Protecting the Lives of Murderers, but Not Babies
Legal Group Puts Sanctuary Jurisdictions on Notice Ahead of Trump's Mass Deportation Opera...
Wishing for Santa-Like Efficiency in the USA
Celebrating the Miracle of Redemption
A Letter to Jesus
Here's Why Texas AG Ken Paxton Sued the NCAA
Of Course NYT Mocks the Virgin Mary
What Is With Jill Biden's White House Christmas Decorations?
Jesus Fulfilled Amazing Prophecies
Meet the Worst of the Worst Biden Just Spared From Execution
OPINION

The White-Hatted Remnant is Coming to Build Things Back

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Tuesday marks the mid-term elections. How will they turn out?

Big net gains for the good guys.

You define the Teapartiers and the Republicans as 'the good guys'?

Advertisement

Definitely. And the leftists, liberals, progressives -- Democrats all -- as the black-hats, or bad guys. Back in the Fifties, watching television westerns, my (older) sister would keep me up to date in the final chase scenes by saying -- based, I finally figured out, on the color of the hats the cowboys were wearing -- 'Those are the good guys. Those are the bad guys. Those are the....' She didn't know it, but she was introducing me to modern politics.

White hats, good guys -- conservatives. Got it. And they're going to win big?

Maybe on a scale of revolutionary magnitude. Predicting elections is like predicting judges -- a highly risky business. But the near-unanimity of the polls suggests this is going to be a wave election, crashing hard onto the liberal Democratic beaches and washing them clean.

WHY?

Because of the Teapartiers. Formally around for only about 18 months, they may prove -- already have proved -- to be game-changers. They share vastly more with the Republicans than the Democrats. So, after the primaries, they, for the most part, allied with the Republicans rather than running third-party candidates of their own. In the process, they've generated unseen electricity into campaigns and have provided the Republicans with too-often-missing backbone.

But the Teapartiers are so -- you know -- extreme. And they're so focused on such divisive social issues: you know -- abortion, homosexuality, bias in the mainline churches and mainstream media.

On the contrary, the Teapartiers have demonstrated their prudence in two genius strokes: (1) not running their own third-party general-election candidates and (2) avoiding social/cultural issues. They speak almost exclusively of spending and taxes and governmental size. They talk of the Founding and constitutional principles. Thus the 'Tea Party' name. The original 'tea party,' when Bostonians dumped tea into their harbor, was all about taxes imposed by the British crown.

Advertisement

THAT WAS pretty extreme to the British.

Of course it was. Obedient British subjects were not supposed to behave that way, but to do what they were told by the British authorities. Today's Teapartiers, allied with Republicans, are tired of being told what to do by today's equivalent of the British crown -- the federal authorities. That's why those who have run things for so long in Washington are so stunned by the speed with which the Tea Party movement has caught on.

Still, it seems these people came out of nowhere -- out of the blue.

Wrong again. They've been there all along. They are the Remnant, the silent majority. People long without a voice -- largely shut out in the New York/Washington-centric media and the corridors of political and ideological power. People weary of unsupportable spending and unsustainable taxes -- and government growing ever bigger and ever more remote. People tired of tone-deaf politicians and staged press conferences and lies and denial and doubletalk and gobbledygook.

The Remnant?

Again, the silent majority -- as described by essayist Albert Jay Nock in his piece, "Isaiah's Job," from chapter 13 of his book "Free Speech and Plain Language" (1937).

OKAY.

In Nock's essay, the Lord tells prophet Isaiah, despondent that no one seems to be listening to him, to press on. A quiet cohort, he says, does notice and is listening. He explains to Isaiah: "There is a Remnant...that you know nothing about. They are obscure, unorganized, inarticulate....They need to be encouraged,...because when everything has gone completely to the dogs, they are the ones who will come back and build up a new society."

Advertisement

'Obscure, unorganized, inarticulate' --

But not any longer. They are today's Teapartiers -- Nock's Remnant given voice at last. They're tired of leftovers and crumbs scrounged under the federal banquet table, and they aren't going to take it anymore. In Tuesday's results we will see the consequences of their anger and frustration.

They're going to win?

Big. When you hear Tea Party, think revolution, because in America the two are linguistic cousins.

How big?

Revolutionary big. Before-and-after big. Big-wave, beach-cleansing big.

We'll see.

Indeed we will. On Tuesday, the white-hatted Remnant is coming to build things back. Mark it well.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos