The Dems' Main Narrative for the Schumer Shutdown Is Falling Apart
CNN's Van Jones Reveals What Schumer Told Him Three Months Ago About Shutting...
AG Bondi to Appeal 'Woefully Insufficient' Sentence for Justice Kavanaugh's Would-be Assas...
No, NYT, We Don't Need to Feel Bad for These People
Scott Wiener: Accusations of Fascism Will Continue Until Conservatives Bend the Knee to...
Colorado Authorities Reopen Investigation Into Death of Hunter S. Thompson
Maxwell House Coffee’s Temporary Rebrand Is Something Else
Hope Amid Chaos in Nigeria
Maryland Accountant Sentenced to 3 Years for $24M COVID Relief Fraud
Over 90,000 Investors Scammed in $200M Bitcoin Fraud
Federal Agents Rammed, Boxed In by 10 Vehicles Near Chicago
Flexing Fraud: Fake Gym at Center of $3M PPP Scam
The Train of Progress Must Not Be Derailed
Trump Ends the Green Scam — Now the Crying Caucus Is Out of...
Make Protecting Animals Great Again: The Trump Administration Is Ending Animal Cruelty
OPINION

The Media’s Big Lie About the Supreme Court

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
AP Photo/Susan Walsh

For several years, establishment media coverage of the Supreme Court has been dominated by claims that the court is “conservative” and governed by a “6-3 conservative majority.”

Advertisement

But the actual decisions from the term just ended—like the decisions in other recent terms—tell a very different story. 

In the term just ended, the media’s mythical “conservative bloc” prevailed over dissents from the three liberal justices only nine percent of the time. By contrast, the justices were unanimous 42 percent of the time. Moreover, on some issues, there was a working 6-3 liberal majority—a majority that sometimes swelled to 7-2. Ketanji Brown Jackson, the justice usually considered most liberal, was in the deciding majority 72 percent of the time.

As demonstrated below, this is a bench whose members differ in judicial philosophy, but where the center of gravity is near the political middle. It is not as liberal as the activist courts of the 20th century, but neither is it really conservative. 

Shifting Majorities

One of the cases that fed the media’s “6-3 conservative” narrative—and accordingly received heavy coverage—was United States v. Skrmetti. There, the justices ruled 6-3 that the State of Tennessee could ban transgender medical procedures on children. Also garnering heavy attention was Trump v. CASA, which curbed universal (sometimes misnamed “nationwide”) injunctions. Ditto for Mahmoud v. Taylor, which held that a public school could not force-feed kids with LGBTQ+ propaganda over their parents’ religious objections. Another ditto for Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, which upheld a Texas law requiring age-verification for viewers of pornographic websites. (For reasons too complicated to go into here, you can characterize this as a centrist rather than as a conservative decision.)

Advertisement

On the other hand, a 6-3 liberal majority prevailed in Kennedy v. Braidwood. In that case, the court once again intervened to preserve a portion of Obamacare from constitutional challenge. The court pieced together disparate parts of federal law to rule that Congress had constitutionally vested the appointment of a powerful commission in the secretary of Health and Human Services rather in the president. The same 6-3 liberal majority decided Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research. There, the court held that even though the power to tax is a quintessential legislative power, Congress could delegate it to an executive agency without any numerical limits on the tax rate or the amount of money collected.

Both of these cases were significant victories for the administrative state, but the media gave them relatively little attention. 

In Bondi v. VanDerStok—the “ghost gun case”—the liberal majority was even more pronounced. Despite what seems to be clear statutory language to the contrary, the court upheld the power of the Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms, Tobacco and Explosives (ATF) to regulate the sale of gun assembly kits. The case was decided 7-2, with only Justices Thomas and Alito dissenting. It was a smashing victory for the administrative state.

Advertisement

The same liberal 7-2 majority ruled against President Donald J. Trump in A.A.R.P. v. Trump. The court held that an illegal alien was entitled to certain due process rights before being deported. (Disclosure: I probably would have joined the liberals on this one.) 

Unanimous Results

Further debunking the fairy tale of the “6-3 conservative majority” were the many cases in which the justices were unanimous. One of the most important was TikTok v. Garland, essentially holding that a company controlled by a foreign government may not spy with impunity because it also engages in activities protected by the First Amendment. In Ames v. Ohio, the court ruled that in a discrimination claim, the government could not impose a heavier burden on members of “majority groups” than on members of minority groups. That ruling was unanimous as well.

Also unanimous was Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin, where the justices agreed that a state could not grant or withhold a religious tax exemption because of a church’s religious doctrine. (Strictly speaking, you might classify this as a liberal rather than a conservative decision because it applied jurisprudence invented by liberal justices during the 20th century.) 

Conclusion

The media’s narrative of a “6-3 conservative majority” is obviously defective. But it does serve a purpose: By tarring the more traditional justices as “conservatives,” the narrative enables liberal commentators to claim rulings they don’t like are driven by right-wing ideology rather than by the law.

Advertisement

 

Robert G. Natelson, a former constitutional law professor who is senior fellow in constitutional jurisprudence at the Independence Institute in Denver, authored “The Original Constitution” (4th ed., 2025). He is a contributor to the Heritage Foundation’s “Heritage Guide to the Constitution.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement