The Look on Scott Jennings' Face When a Guest Discussed Susie Wiles' Vanity...
These Four Traitors in the House GOP Screwed Over Mike Johnson. They Have...
Kamala Harris Got Something Right for a Change
Defunding Planned Parenthood – ACLJ Files 7th Brief to Defund Abortion
Jack Smith Just Made the Most Ridiculous Claim About His Investigation Into Trump
This Is How Democrats Feel About Jasmine Crockett's Run for Senate
Tennessee Democrat Reminds Us His Party Objects to Enforcing Immigration Laws
Fani Willis Plays the Race Card During Georgia Senate Hearing
New Video Paints a Troublesome Picture in Syria One Year After Assad
Comer Postpones Clinton Depositions in Epstein Case Until January, Threatens Contempt Char...
Four More Years: Miriam Adelson Jokingly Tells Trump She’ll Back Another Term
Trump’s Push to End Filibuster Gains Traction Among Senate Republicans
A Wave of Antisemitic Attacks Rocks New York City
Appeals Court Hands Trump a Victory Over National Guard Deployment in DC
Terror in Australia on Hanukkah: Why People of Faith Must Bring Light—Together
OPINION

To the Left, Dodgeball Has Become a 'Tool of Oppression'

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
AP Photo/Mary Altaffer

Wouldn’t you think if someone had a problem with dodgeball being too rough for some kids, they would just say so? Talk it out. Let students have a say. Maybe offer alternative activities. Or maybe save dodgeball for young adults who want to show off their athletic prowess and let the little kids try, say, kickball.

Advertisement

Unfortunately, as happens all too often in academe, a team of cosmic thinkers in British Columbia reached far into the ether of political correctness to slam dodgeball as a “tool of oppression.” More than that, they wailed that the playground game activates not just one but the “five faces of oppression” (conjured by an icon of feminist political theory, the late Iris Marion Young): exploitation, marginalization, powerlessness, cultural imperialism, and violence.

Does a game that entails throwing, dodging, or catching soft rubber balls deserve this much PC vitriol? Granted, if you are agility-challenged (as was I), you might have difficulty dodging a swift throw. However, if you are smarter than the average bear, you could stand your ground and learn how to catch the ball and thus put the smarty-pants flamethrower out of the game.

Does it have to be more complicated than that? Cultural imperialism seems an odd sobriquet considering that this game originated with African warriors who hurled rocks at each other, not rubber balls. Talk about belligerence; it was a war game. Perhaps cultural appropriation happened after a missionary, Dr. James Carlisle, witnessed how much this contest enhanced warriors’ fitness (the surviving ones at least) and consequently brought dodgeball back to England and St. Mary’s College, where he taught. Of course he substituted non-lethal rubber balls for rocks. Squishy Eurocentrism at work.

The attack of the Canadian eggheads deserves a penalty flag for piling-on given that a great many schools and parents have already ditched dodgeball for fear it might encourage bullying. I think a little teacher supervision could mitigate any such danger; nevertheless, the trend is clear.

Advertisement

Perhaps the PC verbal assault is not just against imperialistic dodgeball, also known as “bullyball.” Could all games that end with winners and losers be at risk of extinction? Particularly when the majority of winners may be muscular guys? Even in kickball (in which you kick the ball and run the bases), the appearance of a gifted athlete capable of blasting the ball far into the outfield could intimidate smaller, less athletic kids—thus rendering them marginalized, powerless, and scarred for life.

Ah, but in a mirthful yet instructive piece for Slate, Nick Greene revealed the sure-fire cure for kickball clout: the kickball bunt, which he calls “the most cold-blooded move of all sports.” Just tap the ball a few yards in front of home plate and witness the chaos that ensues. Infielders will stumble over themselves to reach the faintly hit ball and almost always throw wildly to first base. So the meek non-athletic kid ends up on second base while jocks make fools of themselves. Tables turned.

As opposed to nitpicking playground games (there are hundreds of them) for insufficient conformity to PC agendas, wouldn’t a better use of time be to applaud and advocate for more time for kids to run and play, either in structured physical education or more freestyle recess? A fine online piece in Luminate reports on several recent studies showing that kids who get regular exercise not only gain cardiorespiratory and muscular benefits but also make better grades. Yet, sadly, schools have cut back on physical education (recess has nearly vanished) as government mandates keep children in front of their computers or immersed in standardized tests.

Advertisement

Rather than simply making physical education class compulsory (and therefore almost universally hated), I believe a better approach would be to build opportunities to move around briskly into the school day. The Hechinger Report tells of Kaleidoscope Academy, an Appleton, Wisconsin, charter school, where some teachers allow “brain breaks” every 20 minutes, while others offer kids the chance to sit on wobbly chairs during science and math lessons. Lunch includes outdoor recess, and students can choose between exercise-oriented classes: dance or personal fitness.

If some kids also decided on their own volition to play a brisk round of dodgeball or kickball, would that really mark the end of civilization?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement