Get access to Brad Slager's "Riffed From the Headlines," a daily VIP feature where he looks to bring accountability to the mainstream media. Use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!
Given that we were off for the Thanksgiving stretch, we have a batch of media leftovers to serve up.
Artisanally-Crafted Narratives – WASHINGTON POST
Your exposé is just a little bit TOO on the nose.
As the press is running through a routine of one-week news cycles these days (remember when the Epstein emails were all the rage?), the latest outrage has been over some Democrats putting out a video imploring troops to ignore illegal orders. Small problem; these Dems had to admit there were no actual illegal orders they could cite, which made the entire intent of the video asinine and worthless.
Then in comes the Washington Post with a bailout story. The site claimed that, according to anonymous sources (naturally), there was an incident where a drug cartel boat had been struck, but there were survivors. Those, according to WaPo, were then killed by the U.S. military in a second strike. This would violate international law and would also serve as a prime example of what the Democrats were incapable of showing.
Recommended
Small matter that Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell, the Department of War Press Office, and Secretary Hegseth himself came out to say the entire report was not accurate in any manner. Nah, just run with the anonymous sources accusing war crimes took place.
Hegseth order on first Caribbean boat strike, officials say: Kill them all
— H. Walter Muchow (@hwm777) November 28, 2025
As two men clung to a stricken, burning ship targeted by SEAL Team 6, the Joint Special Operations commander followed the defense secretary’s order to leave no survivors.https://t.co/PRg8ccF0As
Low-Octane Gaslighting – CNN
We get that you want to slam him, yet you gave us the denial you said he ducked from giving…
The reliably flawed Pentagon correspondent Natasha Bertrand gives a quixotic dose of coverage on the drug boat flap. She claims that Secretary Hegseth is avoiding comment on the report from the Washington Post, and yet, she says so in response to his very post that calls the report "fraudulent."
No denial here that a second strike deliberately killed survivors on Sept 2, as we and the Post reported today. https://t.co/nErP80l4UT https://t.co/irudMAZk5B
— Natasha Bertrand (@NatashaBertrand) November 28, 2025
Pre-Written Field Reports – MS NOW
Uniforms, Ken? They were killed for wearing uniforms?!
After word broke that a pair of National Guard troops were ambushed and shot in D.C., there was a familiar approach to the story in the press. There was very little in the way of exhaustive investigation into who this individual was, and that is a familiar tell.
Of course, we eventually learned this was an Afghan immigrant, and as such, it means the press focus had to be on anything but the shooter. And there was Ken Dilanian, exploring possible motives for this attack and straining to come up with a way to steer the focus onto the Trump administration.
MS NOW's Ken Dilanian just after 3pm Eastern on the shooting of two National Guard troops in Washington D.C...
— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) November 26, 2025
"[O]f course, you know, there's so much controversy happening in the United States right now with ice, who are also wearing uniforms and wearing masks. And so there's,… pic.twitter.com/p6IPk6XTWl
News Avoidance Syndrome – ABC NEWS
Exploring for reasons while ignoring the details.
Aaron Katersky was certainly desperate to find a motivation for the shooting of two National Guard troops. Maybe "find" is the wrong word; "deflect" certainly feels more likely, as the newsman gives a speculative list of things that could have inspired this ambush attack, but he fails to explore one of the reported details of the attack.
That being the shooter was from Afghanistan and shouted "Allahu Akbar" during his assault.
WHAT?! ABC's Aaron Katersky speculating on a motive in the shooting of two National Guard troops in Washington D.C.....
— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) November 26, 2025
"Focus will turn to whether these guardsmen were specifically targeted. If that's the case, it would fit with what we've been hearing from law enforcement… pic.twitter.com/cyB4SFlPMs
Matching Media Memorandum – VARIOUS OUTLETS
You know, maybe Americans have a more valid reason to be concerned?
You truly have to wonder how so many in the press fail to recognize when they lapse into tropes that are long known to exist. Anytime there has been a violent attack instigated by a protected social group, the punchline is how that group will be looked at more sympathetically over projected possible backlash than the actual victims of the actual crime.
And yet, just like clockwork, after the Afghan attack on the National Guard troops, here came the press with their concerns that Afghan residents are now going to be fearful that they could become targets of…some sort of perceived negative reactions.
CNN: “Afghans in America are now living in fear.”pic.twitter.com/O4aPGs26m6
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) November 28, 2025
Border-Line Obsession – ABC NEWS
Not even co-eds on holiday break are safe from ICE detention efforts!
The network has the galling report of ICE officials crudely taking a college student into custody as she was about to fly home for Thanksgiving. We get the usual blather from a lawyer declaring how this was all overly aggressive and in violation of a court order that a federal judge issued to block her removal.
Far less important – based on the fact that the network did not include this until the final paragraph – was that this individual had a standing deportation order that was a decade old.
A 19-year-old college student who was on her way to surprise her family for Thanksgiving break was detained at a Boston airport and later deported despite a federal judge's order blocking her removal, according to her attorney.
— ABC News (@ABC) November 28, 2025
Read more: https://t.co/rg187gVCCb pic.twitter.com/x0BaGqpobv

