OPINION
Premium

CNN: Your Democratic Party Epstein-Connection Scandal Clean-up Network!

Brad Slager
Brad Slager  |  Nov 20, 2025
The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

Get access to Brad Slager's "Riffed From the Headlines," a daily VIP feature where he looks to bring accountability to the mainstream media. Use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!

Democratic Custodial Services – CNN

  • Wait, his fundraisers reached out to Epstein, so it is not HIS fault…?!

As the Epstein emails are exposed, and the Epstein Files are about to arrive, one thing has become clear: The Democrats wanted the Trump-Epstein Scandal, just not anything approaching actual evidence to come out. This is because the Democrats have been the ones to become increasingly entwined with the scabrous sex trafficker.

Yesterday, we highlighted how Democratic Rep. Stacey Plaskett was implicated and needed to go on air with Wolf Blitzer to attempt to preserve her dignity. Now we have more examples of Democrats in need of rehabilitation, and CNN offering them the platform. Hakeem Jeffries was found to have petitioned Epstein for donations, well after the man had been charged with his sex crimes. Hakeem's explanation? An outside outfit had been the source of that outreach, not himself personally.

So, a group attempting to get Epstein's money for Jeffries means that Jeffries is not somehow culpable here, is that the read?

Democratic Custodial Services – CNN (Again)

  • Look, just because she brought it up on the House floor does not mean she was implying anything!

In possibly the biggest face-plant seen in Congress in some time (and that is significant in itself), Democratic wizard Jasmine Crockett took to the House microphone to deliver a speech where she laid out a list of Republicans who collected donations from Jeffrey Epstein.

And, in one manner, she was actually correct. The issue? These were individuals with that name, but they were not the infamous pedophile sybarite. Crockett and her staff conducted the weakest amount of research and listed off those Republicans without doing actual research. As Lee Zeldin explained in a post torching the politician, his donations came from a doctor in the New York area. And, best of all, his donation and one other she listed had been delivered in 2020, which is AFTER the death of Jeffrey Epstein.

Crockett went on with Kaitlan Collins to try explaining how it was not her fault they got the details wrong because she was in a hurry, and she had stated the money came from "a" Jeffrey Epstein, and even though she had been attempting to slander Republicans, it should not be considered that she had intended to…uh, well, slander Republicans.

Unbelievable.

Artisanally-Crafted Narratives – POLITICO

  • This kind of projection might be outdoing the local drive-in.

There was some big news to come out. It appears a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia may finally be brokered, with the deal maybe arriving by the end of this month. This should normally be regarded as good news, but this is the press we are talking about, and anything reflecting on Trump in a positive light cannot be tolerated.

At Politico, they resorted to the most base of explanations of what had "actually" taken place.

See, as they explain it, Trump had not been working on this deal for the majority of this year. Nope. He snapped into action and got this deal made for one reason – to draw attention away from all of the Epstein talk:

PEACE IN OUR TIME? So this is one way to distract from the Epstein files.

Uh…sure. The people who ramped up the Epstein hysterics to deflect from the shutdown failure are now accusing Trump of being the one seeking out a distraction.

Low-Octane Gaslighting – YALE CLIMATE CONNECTIONS

  • Wow, this makes the sex trafficking pedophile sound kind of bad, now.

At the Yale University environmental publication, they managed to find something truly objectionable with Jeffrey Epstein: It turns out the man who groomed, kidnapped, and trafficked underage victims to lend them out to his wealthy predator friends and clients on his secluded private pedophile island was actually a bad guy because he questioned climate change!

Not content with just this impacted approach, writer Sara Peach did everything she could to also implicate Donald Trump in this dose of desperation, even from the subheading. Just behold this marvelous example of an ad-hoc non-sequitur:

One Epstein victim said recently that about 1,000 women had survived his abuse. As for Trump, his pro-fossil-fuel policies will lead to up to 1.3 million additional temperature-related deaths around the world in the coming decades, according to a new analysis by ProPublica and the Guardian.

And just to drop a cherry onto this dollop of misguided attempted journalism, you will find – given this is a college outlet and sensitivities could be impacted – a trigger warning is applied to the prose:

A heads up: In addition to references to climate-related misinformation, this article mentions allegations of sexual misconduct and crimes.

GASP!

Border-line Obsessives – ORLANDO SENTINEL

  • Any chance that maybe this codger did anything objectionable…?

In the latest example of the press wanting to demonize ICE agents and sanctify an undesirable person, the Orlando paper delivers this news of those crude and cruel ICE agents detaining a sweet, genteel, 70-year-old man in Alligator Alcatraz. This is such a pathetic pattern.

We get his family looking solemn, we get an old photo of the victimized man, and the tortured prose is always delivered sympathetically in these pieces:

Paul John Bojerski was born to Polish parents in a German refugee camp a year after World War II ended. His family legally emigrated to the United States in 1952 when he was five. More than seven decades later, the 79-year-old Sanford grandfather – still a man without a country – found himself in legal limbo in the Alligator Alcatraz detention camp in the Everglades, picked up on a decades-old deportation order authorities had previously chosen not to enforce.

Say now, you stated that he had a standing deportation order? That seems…curious. What would that have been made for, after all?? There is a blithe mention that he once had "a run-in with the law," but very little more is initially given. Very little remains throughout the article, until we learn – 32 PARAGRAPHS INTO THIS EPIC WEEP-FEST – that this man was convicted of rape.

But otherwise, he is a sweet retiree who should remain in the country.