OPINION
Premium

D.C. Crime Facts Has the Press Showing Arrested Development

Brad Slager
Brad Slager  |  Aug 19, 2025
The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

 Get access to Brad Slager's "Riffed From the Headlines," a daily VIP feature where he looks to bring accountability to the mainstream media. Use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!

Both Kinds of Standards – CNN

  • Remember when the press was recently playing along, or nah?!

Brian Stelter has found the latest thing to aggravate him as he and his network look to distract from the growing peace accord President Trump is moving ahead with involving Ukraine and Russia. Brian looked at the post-NATO summit presser in the White House and was rather bugged to see alternative media getting a chance to ask questions.

Stelter has an inside source in the White House press pool, which means he is a conduit for crank reporters to bitch and moan about those less-than-journalists who are now allowed in the room.

Hmmmm…served set-ups, to be able to deliver pre-determined talking points. Something about this seems familiar. In fact, we recall more blatant examples of this taking place recently. What we do not recall is this level of concerned hand-wringing from Mr. Stelter when it was exposed that President Biden was actually provided the questions from specific reporters ahead of press conferences. 

Recommended

European Leaders' Remarks About Trump During Ukraine Peace Talks Are Driving the Media Insane Matt Vespa
Karoline Leavitt Should Be Arrested for Brutalizing This Clueless Reporter on Live TV Jeff Charles

Somehow, he and the other White House correspondents were never heard from expressing contempt over the lack of professionalism or how the press corps was molded to serve Joe Biden’s desires. But today, it is unacceptable.

Reporting on the Mirror – NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO

  • This becomes a classic case of the “Main Character Syndrome”.

As the “controversy” over the policing of Washington, D.C. continues, the press remains on the side of not wanting to fight crime. What is becoming apparent is that some are gradually realizing this folly and are struggling to retain the narrative.

One such case is seen from NPR fixture Steve Inskeep. He seemed to think that a personal anecdote he delivered about one late-night experience he had should be sufficient to cancel out the enforcement of the laws by National Guardsmen. Steve detailed how he was coming into work in the wee hours and encountered a man in some form of distress, and he boldly dialed 911 and waited for the experts to arrive – you know, the people who actually do things.

As the hero in his own story, Steve seems to think this serves as proof, somehow, that additional forces are not needed in the city. But this tale he regales us with is done to ignore that since the troops came in, nearly 400 arrests have taken place, and the streets are becoming clear in the district.

Also cute is the way the man from the network that a month ago was demanding the federal government spend copiously for its benefit is today supposedly fretful over the federal expense of these troops patrolling in D.C.

Pathological Media Amnesia – NEW YORK TIMES

  • Say, Peter? Recall telling us your current claim was not taking place?

Also strung up by this D.C. crime-fighting issue has been Peter Baker. Pete has been consistently against the thought of sending in forces – he just has not been consistent as to why.

After insisting there has not been cause for this decision (Baker was among those exposed by the story of the crime stats being fudged), now he comes out with a new complaint: These troops are not in areas where the crime is taking place!
…uh, that is…in the areas where he said there was no crime taking place…we think…

News Avoidance Syndrome – VARIOUS OUTLETS

  • Funny thing - the news media were all about crime statistics BEFORE the National Guard went in.

After President Trump sent in the troops to help secure the streets of Washington, D.C. (with the thankful blessing of the police union), we are seeing the results. And…the press seems not to like the positive results.

After just over a week, and hundreds of arrests, there are actual before and after crime stats to peer over. Here is what the media is uncurious about.

Prose & Contradiction – ABC NETWORK

  • Soooo…about your support for conservative commentators…

In a piece that should serve as the headstone for the Stephen Colbert cancellation story, Jimmy Kimmel was interviewed by Variety. Among his claims was Kimmel saying in a lecturing tone that he is disappointed people on the right were not supporting free speech, unlike himself.

  • I think we were all shocked and disappointed that this kind of thing is happening in America, and also disappointed that we don’t see more people on the right stepping up and saying, “Hey, this is no good.” Silencing comedians, commentators, whatever you want to call people… I have to say, if Joe Biden had used his muscle to get Sean Hannity kicked off the air, you may be surprised to learn that I would not support that. I would, in fact, support Sean Hannity in that situation.

Except, he has supported that in the not-too-distant past. Look in on how he reacted when Tucker Carlson was fired by Fox News. Kimmel was far apart from outrage or support, as he was dancing on his professional grave.

Low Octane Gas Lighting – NEW YORK TIMES

  • Just admit it, gang – you are rooting for him to fail.

The Times has given up even trying to pretend anymore; the outlet is openly opposed to Trump striking the peace deal between Ukraine and Russia. Every step of the way over the past week the paper has been entirely negative and treating all of the talks as an abject failure. Then we see them moving into pure fiction to avoid giving Trump any credit.

After the NATO meeting at the White House, the Times concluded that it was the European leaders who had been pressuring Trump to act appropriately.

Apparently, the Times was hoping people were not getting news from any other sources. As we covered yesterday, Marco Rubio had been calling for exactly this during the Sunday news shows sweep he was on. Also, the NATO Secretary General came out of Monday’s meeting at the White House saying directly that it was Trump who set up this deal.