I Bet Sports Partnering With Prediction Markets Will Be a Disaster
Cold Zero: A Thriller That Hits Where Fiction Collides With Geopolitics
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 312: 'The Glory of These Forty Days'
Goodness Exists, Though You’d Never Know It From the Corporate Media
So What's the Score?
Brother Love the Earth’s Traveling Salvation Show
What Tim Pool Says on God’s Omnipotence and the Laws of Logic
Truth on Trial
Antisemitism, Canaries in Coal Mines, Conspiracy Theories, and Kool-Aid
Reclaiming Biblical Femininity Amid Cultural Assault
Lessons to Learn From the Titanic
BlackRock Sets New Standard for Progress in Shareholder Responsiveness on Charitable Gift-...
The Death Spiral to America Reimagined
Nick Shirley Hires Private Security Because Leftists Doxx Him
OPINION

Biden Administration Push to Weaken Credit Standards Resuscitated by Bureaucrats

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Biden Administration Push to Weaken Credit Standards Resuscitated by Bureaucrats
AP Photo

When you need to make an important decision, you should gather a lot of information first.  

Think about the last time you bought a car. Did you walk on a lot, point to a vehicle, and pay the full sticker price? No. This isn’t like buying a bunch of bananas or a gallon of milk, where you can simply grab and go. This is a big decision that will impact you for years.

Advertisement

Before even talking to a salesman, you probably researched autos online, decided what features you wanted, weighed all the other factors on reviews and ratings (both objective and subjective), and decided how much you would be willing to spend and how much it should cost. Only then, having done research, would you go look at a car. And you probably looked at several before bringing one home.

This isn’t “paralysis by analysis.” You are, after all, going to make a purchase. But you need to do the analysis to know you are being treated fairly and making a smart decision.

Not surprisingly, the people who loan money to home buyers also try to gather plenty of information before they sign on the dotted line. There are three different companies that track consumer credit, and lenders usually pull a report from each of them. This is known as the tri-merge credit reporting standard. Lenders review the reports to get an accurate idea of how risky a loan will be. This allows them to charge a fair interest rate: customers with poor credit are riskier bets and will pay more for a loan.

There is a good reason why companies that lend for homes don’t rely on just one or two credit reports to make a decision. Research shows that relying on a single credit report instead of the tri-merge standard can significantly change a borrower’s credit score. In one analysis, a third of consumers had at least one single report score that differed from the tri-merge score by 10 points or more; 18 percent by at least 20 points; and seven percent by 40 points or more.

Advertisement

By pulling three credit scores, lenders have a better picture of a borrower’s financial history and potential to repay over time. Unfortunately, the federal government is being lobbied to reduce the number of credit scores lenders are required to consider, potentially forcing decisions with less complete information.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) is the government agency established in 2008 that oversees lending. During the Biden administration, the agency started considering changes to this tri-merge system, including allowing fewer credit reports. In the first year of the Trump administration, outside groups cranked up the pressure to allow a bi-merge (only two credit reports) or even a single-pull system (only one report). The Biden Administration proposal should concern lenders and borrowers alike.

For example, reducing credit visibility would force lenders and investors to raise interest rates to protect themselves from the uncertainty inherent in loans relying on less data. The higher mortgage rates that result would become the standard for all borrowers. 

Even if you aren’t planning to buy or refinance a home, this decision could ripple through the economy and hurt you. The housing finance market is deeply interconnected, and the second-order effects from losing the tri-merge would lead to a weaker market with higher costs for all of us. 

Advertisement

Today, government-backed entities support nearly three-quarters of all mortgages. Taxpayers are directly exposed to the health of mortgage loans, so it’s critical that the government protect itself and us by maintaining strong safeguards and reliable credit evaluation, such as the tri-merge standard.

The push for a bi-merge or single-pull system is a remnant of the Biden era, when the president and his team abandoned economic reality for an ideological gambit. That didn’t work out well, and the Trump administration should resist this push to resuscitate these foolish credit proposals.

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical Left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement