Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
This Democrat Made a Huge Mistake When Celebrating Jasmine Crockett's Endorsement
British Citizens Are in an Abusive Relationship With Their Government
The Rules for California Stop at Gavin Newsom’s Driveway
BLM Co-founder Arrested on Domestic Assault Charges
JD Vance Calls for GOP Unity, Touts Trump Agenda at AmericaFest 2025
America’s Food Stamp Program Mostly Runs on Outdated Technology
Coast Guard Intercepts Third Venezuelan Oil Tanker
Lawlessness in Seattle: Elderly Woman Blinded in Attack by Career Criminal
Hakeem Jeffries Dodges Question on Poll Showing Democrats at 18% Approval
7 Charged in $775K SNAP Fraud Scheme at Pennsylvania Convenience Store
Rand Paul Isn't Liking Trump's Decision to Seize Venezuelan Ships
Two Romanian Nationals Indicted in Oregon SNAP Fraud Scheme Allegedly Stealing Over $160,0...
USPS Chicago Employee Charged With Collecting $51K in Fraudulent Benefits, Feds Say
The Geese Are Being Stolen From Parks Again
OPINION

Uncertainty and Possible Confusion

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

We are talking about a Super Bowl-size audience as more people than ever turned to the Vice Presidential debate last Thursday. Who won? It apparently depends upon who was asked and how the question was phrased. CBS and CNN both had overnight polls and both claimed that Senator Joseph R. (Joe) Biden, Jr. won by a landslide. But pollster Frank Luntz assembled a large group in St. Louis, about half of whom had voted for President George W. Bush and the other half had voted for Senator John F. Kerry in 2004. That group overwhelmingly felt that Governor Sarah Heath Palin had won the debate. These were all undecided voters and a number of them said they were now inclined toward the McCain-Palin ticket on account of her performance.

Advertisement

While that debate drew an unprecedented audience, it is doubtful that many voters will cast their vote based upon their evaluation of the Vice Presidential candidates. One thing which may help Senator John S. McCain, III is that 55% in the CBS Poll believe that Governor Palin is qualified to be President, should that become necessary. The percentage had been much lower in a previous CBS Poll.

There is now less than a month before voters cast their ballots in the Presidential election. Senator Barack Hussein Obama has a significant lead at this point. In fact, no Presidential candidate equally far behind as McCain a month out has won the Presidency. Obama, upon that basis, should be breaking out the champagne. But Obama is not, in light of the Bradley Factor. That refers to the gubernatorial campaign in California during which the Mayor of Los Angeles polled far ahead of the Attorney General of California. However, when the votes were counted Mayor Tom Bradley was defeated by 50,000 votes. Respondents to polling firms wanted to be politically correct by saying that Bradley was their candidate. When they got into the privacy of the voting booth they voted the other way. Obama worries about the Bradley Factor because in several primary contests he over-polled the actual result.

It may not only be the Bradley Factor which has caused the Obama camp to pause. Former Clinton advisor Dick Morris believes that Obama has peaked too soon. He has forecast that Obama support will begin to decline in another week and that by election day the race will be dead even again. Of course, Morris is not always correct in his analysis. He thought McCain's move to suspend his campaign in order to work on the bailout was "brilliant." It turned out the public viewed this as somewhat of a gimmick. McCain's support declined each day from the time he suspended his campaign.

Advertisement

University of Virginia political guru Professor Larry Sabato said normally Obama could expect to be elected given the current circumstances but given this volatile year any day could produce a game changer, so voters should not draw any conclusion yet.

Fourteen percent of the electorate is said to be undecided. Should that group break strongly toward one candidate or the other it could produce a landslide for Obama or a very close election with McCain having a slight edge. And then there are the Congressional elections. Voter outrage may continue through November 4. If so, how would it translate in the elections? Would voters turn out of office those who supported the bailout? That is unclear. Or could voters resent those who voted no on the ground that something had to be done and they rejected that opportunity?

Before all this turmoil I had suggested that we might have some surprises on Election Day. It is impossible to know how exactly the outrage on the part of the electorate will translate into votes. We do know that the Democrats have a superior ground game (voter ID and turnout) just as the Republicans had a superior ground game in 2004 which resulted in that party gaining four Senate seats. Now on paper the Democrats appear to gain a minimum of five Senate seats. That is unless voter outrage changes that outlook.

Pack a good picnic brunch and prepare for an all-night marathon election night and the morning after. Unless we have a landslide in the making we are likely to have a marathon election with many confusing results. Why not? Think of what already has happened this year.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement