Chris Cuomo Had a Former Leftist Call in to His Show. He Clearly...
This Town Filled Its Coffers With a Traffic Shakedown Scheme – Now They...
USAID You Want a Revolution?
Roy Cooper Dodges Tough Questions About His Deadly Soft-on-Crime Policies
Colorado Democrats Want to Trample First, Second Amendments With Latest Bill
White House Religious Liberty Commission Member Removed After Hijacking Antisemitism Heari...
Federal Judge Blocks Pete Hegseth From Reducing Sen. Mark Kelly's Pay Over 'Seditious...
AG Pam Bondi Vows to Prosecute Threats Against Lawmakers, Even Across Party Lines
20 Alleged 'Free Money' Gang Members Indicted in Houston on RICO, Murder, and...
'Green New Scam' Over: Trump Eliminates 2009 EPA Rule That Fueled Unpopular EV...
Tim Walz Wants Taxpayers to Give $10M in Forgivable Loans to Riot-Torn Businesses
The SAVE Act Fights Ends When It Lands on Trump's Desk for Signature
Georgia Man Sentenced to Over 3 Years in Prison for TikTok Threats to...
Walz Administration Claims $217M in Fraud After Prosecutor Pointed to Billions
2 Pakistani Nationals Charged in $10M Medicare Fraud Scheme
OPINION

Duty Drawback Benefits American Manufacturers and Exporters

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
 Duty Drawback Benefits American Manufacturers and Exporters
AP Photo/Evan Vucci

Protecting the duty drawback program is vital for expanding American manufacturing and increasing exports for American companies.

President Trump and Republicans' recently enacted One Big Beautiful Bill Act, delivers major wins for U.S. manufacturers with pro-growth tax cuts including permanent 100 percent bonus deprecation and expensing for research and development costs.

Advertisement

As Republicans now look to build on the success of President Trump’s tax cuts with a second reconciliation bill, protecting duty drawback should remain a priority for Congress as it aims to grow our domestic manufacturing.

Congress currently grants U.S. exporters the opportunity to recover tariffs paid on imported products when that product, a product incorporating the imported product as a component, or a like-kind product is exported. This reimbursement is known as a duty drawback.

Today, drawback is used across the world and is available to any industry. Federal law has allowed drawbacks stretching back more than 200 years. The practice is as old as the United States itself and has proven successful in incentivizing domestic manufacturing and reducing the trade deficit.

The practice of duty drawbacks incentivizes American manufacturers to grow their reach in international markets by reducing their tax burden and lowering costs for managing complex supply chains. This allows these businesses to price competitively and ultimately lowers the cost of everyday goods for households.

Without duty drawback, U.S. manufacturers would be at a competitive disadvantage to foreign competitors. The European Union, China, Mexico and Canada are all among the many nations that offer duty drawback.

This is why U.S. manufacturers have fought back against previous efforts to restrict duty drawback.

Advertisement

During the Biden administration, the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) took the Treasury Department to court over promulgated regulations aimed at curtailing drawbacks allowed for excise tax payments. The case rose all the way to the U.S. Court of Appeals where NAM was ultimately successful.

The judge didn’t pull any punches in rendering his decision against Treasury, finding that the government’s position “produces an absurd result that fails at Chevron step one,” and that the “legislative history of the drawback regime demonstrates that Congress chose to expand access to drawbacks at the expense of excise taxes.”

Past efforts to restrict duty drawback have also gained the ire of conservative grassroots organizations.

In 2018, a coalition of taxpayer and free-market organizations including Americans for Tax Reform, National Taxpayers Union and the Taxpayers Protection Alliance released a letter in opposition to proposed regulations restricting the use of duty drawback for federal excise taxes including alcohol, tobacco, and fuel taxes.

In the letter, the groups warn that restricting duty drawback “undermines American competitiveness by restricting exports, goes against the legislative intent of Congress, and sets a precedent of using tax and trade export programs to discriminate against industries.”

In 2016, with Republicans controlling both the House and Senate, Congress passed the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act (TFTEA) with the goal of expanding the duty drawback proposal to promote U.S. exports and reduce compliance burdens for business and the government.

Advertisement

By passing TFTEA, Congress actively chose to retain drawback for excise taxes and made the program easier to administer and comply with by tying drawback eligibility from the vague and subjective standard of “commercially interchangeable goods” to goods that are classified under the same eight-digit Harmonized Trade System (HTS) number.

As Republicans craft policy aimed at growing domestic manufacturing and boosting U.S. exports, they should seek to build upon their own success of strengthening the duty drawback program.

Doing so will increase American competitiveness and build upon the success of the Trump tax cuts to grow our economy.

Mike Palicz is the Director of Tax Policy at Americans for Tax Reform

Editor’s Note: The Schumer Shutdown is here. Rather than put the American people first, Chuck Schumer and the radical Democrats forced a government shutdown for healthcare for illegals. They own this.

Help us continue to report the truth about the Schumer Shutdown. Use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your VIP membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement