Speaker Johnson Had a Legislative Hat Trick Today While Thune Wants to Sell...
Police Chief Secretly Installs AI Surveillance Cameras, Then Justifies It After Getting Bu...
Abdul El-Sayed Is Losing Black Voters, So the Damage Control Has Begun
WisDems Are Begging for an Early Voting Ballot Do-Over
Press Struggles With Immigrant Voting It Denies Happening; 'The View' Has Its Dress...
Polls Show Susan Collins Is Doing Well Against Troy Jackson, Too
Americans Should Not Be Falling for Socialism
Maryland Audit: $2 Million Lottery Winner Kept Collecting Food Stamps
Day 12: U.S. Pounds Iran to Protect Ships in Strait of Hormuz
Rashida Tlaib Goes to Bat for Mamdani, Says She'll Help Arrest Netanyahu
New Jersey Man Sentenced to 48 Months in $4 Million Medicaid Fraud Scheme
Congressional Stock Trading Is About to Get Much Harder
Protecting, Saving and Spending: The Latest on Congressional Noise
Secret Service Seizes $25 Million in Crypto Tied to International Fraud Networks
NJ Software Vendor Says State Is to Blame for Erroneous Registration of 6,600...
OPINION

Hang Together or Hang Alone

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Hang Together or Hang Alone

There's one sure way for Republicans and conservatives to lose the 2012 presidential election -- split over who their presidential nominee will be, and fail to go all-out to support the winner.

People keep asking me, "What would your father, Ronald Reagan, do?" The answer is easy. No matter who the nominee is, he or she would get his support. After all, his famous "11th Commandment" demanded that Republicans support their party's nominee, no matter who he or she might be.

He certainly would have supported John McCain in 2008. Tragically, if the party of Ronald Reagan had followed what would have been his lead, John McCain -- not Barack Obama -- would the president of these United States today. If Obama is not to be re-elected in 2012, Republicans need to get their act together, decide on a nominee, and back him or her to the hilt.

Let's look at some flaws of the current frontrunners. Both Romney and Perry, like the rest of us, have their share of flaws -- Perry for having signed an executive order to inoculate 12-year-old girls against HPV, and signing a bill to provide in-state tuition to illegal aliens.

As for Mitt Romney, his membership in the Mormon church has earned the hostility of some Christians, and his institution of so-called Romneycare when he was governor of Massachusetts has been questioned by many conservatives.

As things stand now, either Perry or Romney will be the 2012 Republican presidential nominee. Republicans will be obliged to support the winner if we can hope to win the presidential election, no matter the flaws.

It's important to recall that Ronald Reagan outraged some Republicans when as California's governor he raised taxes and signed an abortion bill and became the first California governor to sign a no-fault divorce law Despite all this, he still went on to become the greatest U.S. president of our lifetime.

If he were alive today and we were to nominate him in 2012, I wonder which wing of the GOP his opponents would come from.

Regardless of the outcome of such a confrontation, Republicans will have to either hang together or hang alone.

Should either Romney or Perry win the GOP presidential nomination, we are either going to support the winner in the November election or watch Barack Obama win a second term. Republicans simply can't afford to be bystanders in 2012.

Put it this way: Who do you hope will be the president when 2013 dawns: Barack Obama or a Republican? The answer is clear, whether our nominee is Romney or Perry or even someone else, such as Michele Bachmann.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement