Does Obama Have Presidential Immunity for Russiagate?
CNN's Top Legal Analyst Just Blew Apart the Dems' Anti-Trump Narrative on Federalizing...
The Dems' 'Crime in DC Is Down' Narrative Just Got Taken to the...
The Daily Beast Just Got a Brutal Fact-Check...and It's Absolutely Insane
The Democrats’ Mortifying Public Impotence
A City-Run Grocery Store in Missouri Closed. Want to Guess the Reason?
Time To Stop F-ing Around at the FDA
Acclaimed NYC Restaurant That Went Entirely Plant-Based Issues Update That Has Enraged Veg...
End Biden’s Big Labor Giveaway Before the Rail Merger Rolls
With a Side Order of Truth
Trump Sees Himself as DC's Top Lawman
Making American Children Healthy Again
How Trump Is Beating China at Its Own Game
Tulsi Gabbard Declassifies Bombshell Email Proving Russia Hoax Was Manufactured
DOJ Smashes Transnational Elder Fraud Ring That Stole Over $5M from 400 Seniors
OPINION

Republicans: Win or Lose; You Choose

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

Have you ever tried to get out of a speeding ticket by arguing that everyone speeds, so speeding laws are now invalid?

How'd that work?

Yet, that's exactly the argument that Harry Reid and the liberal media are trying to push on Senate Republicans.

Advertisement

The Senate rules are clear: Rule XXII still requires 60 votes to invoke cloture on any nomination or legislation, including attorney general nominee Loretta Lynch. Since Lynch won't have 60 votes, her nomination can't be confirmed if the Senate follows its own rules.

But here's the rub: Harry Reid has repeatedly violated this rule, through his "nuclear option." And many people erroneously believe that Reid's repeated violation of the rules effectively repeals the rules.

Using this line of reasoning: Obama's failure to implement ObamaCare effectively changes ObamaCare. Obama's executive amnesty trumps immigration law. Obama's illegal "executive action" gun control overrules any statute inconsistent with it.

All other things being equal, signing onto this narrative would be a horrible mistake.

But all other things aren't equal: Loretta Lynch now has 50 votes, plus Biden, but does not have the 60 votes necessary to break an expected filibuster.

Thus, if the GOP follows the rules, and appeals any illegal ruling from the chair, it defeats Loretta Lynch and her commitment to implement illegal executive amnesty. If the GOP ignores the rules, it loses, and Obama does yet another victory dance around his lawless actions.

In order to force the GOP to embrace Reid's unlawful precedent for the purpose of implementing Obama's illegal actions, Senate Democrats (i.e., the party of Jim Crow) are now labeling Republicans as racists for not moving Lynch's nomination.

Advertisement

Of course, the same Democrats could have confirmed Lynch in the "lame duck session," had they not been so busy packing the courts -- with all of the enthusiasm of kids cramming shoplifted candy down their pants.

But Republicans should understand this: If Lynch is confirmed, she is the Supreme Court's "fifth-vote-in-waiting." If they think opposing her is painful now, wait until the Supreme Court is at stake. The megaphone heaping calumny on the GOP will be a thousand times as loud.

I learned two useful skills in high school. The first, in ROTC, was how to clean and shoot a semi-automatic rifle. The second was how to play chess.

Chess-players will understand that this week's failure to stop Lynch could put control of the Supreme Court out of our reach in the future. If Republicans wait until Lynch, Obama, and Clinton declare "checkmate," there will be nothing anyone can do for them.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement