Sorry Dems, Affordability Is Trump's Strength
We Got Him: Brown University Shooter Found Dead in New Hampshire
Retirement Accounts Come Roaring Back in 2025
Can the Dark Ages Return?
Trump's National Speech Has the Press Spinning Wildly, Leading to Dizzying Partisan Analys...
Judge Hannah Dugan Found Guilty of Felony Obstruction, Not Guilty of Misdemeanor Charge
Chanukah Is Relevant for Everyone – but Not in the Way You Might...
Animal Rights Grinches Target NJ Fish and Game Council
Yes, Chabad
Ilhan Omar Can Accuse ICE With No Proof
We Have Reached the Emily Litella Moment on Climate Change
Another Jewish Massacre on a Jewish Holy Day Is a Wake-Up Call to...
Virginia’s Incoming Democratic Governor Doubles Down on Bias
It Will Be Okay
Jon Ossoff Is Just Another Elitist Liberal
OPINION

Harvard Health Policy Review on the IRS’s Illegal ObamaCare Taxes

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

In the just-released Spring 2013 issue of Harvard Health Policy Review, I have an article titled “ObamaCare: The Plot Thickens.”

The article examines the IRS rule that purportedly implements ObamaCare’s tax credits, but actually violates that statute by taxing, borrowing, and spending hundreds of billions of dollars contrary to Congress’ explicit instructions.

The article is a less-technical version of my Health Matrix article (coauthored with Jonathan Adler, “Taxation Without Representation: The Illegal IRS Rule to Expand Tax Credits Under the PPACA.”)

Here’s an excerpt:

In broad daylight, the Internal Revenue Service is attempting to tax, borrow, and spend [roughly] $800 billion—contrary to both the express language of the PPACA and congressional intent. Thus in addition to other abuses that have recently come to light, the IRS is attempting to tax millions of employers and individuals without congressional authorization…

In this still-unfolding narrative, the Obama administration’s actions are triply anti-democratic. First, the IRS is violating a direct constraint that popularly elected legislators placed on the executive branch. Second, it is violating that duly enacted statute for the purpose of denying popularly elected state officials the vetoes Congress gave them over certain provisions of the statute. And third, it is violating the statute because administration officials either cannot fathom or will not accept that Congress meant to do what it clearly did.

Obama administration officials continually emphasize that the PPACA is “the law of the land.” That remains to be seen, in more ways than one.

Advertisement


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement