There's One GOP Senator Who Knows the Dangers of Letting This BBB Provision...
Here's What Senate Dems Plan to Do to Gum Up the Works for...
Well, We Knew This GOP Senator Was Going to Screw Us
Supreme Court Made a Surprising Move in the Louisiana Redistricting Case Yesterday
Hegseth Reveals the Official New Name of the USNS Harvey Milk
Sabotage? Schumer Drags Out Trump’s BBB With All-Night Stunt to Delay GOP Victory
DHS Raids Los Angeles Home Tied to Iranian Smuggling Ring; Terror Watchlist Suspects...
Senate Gears Up to Vote on Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’
Five GOP Lawmakers Threaten to Tank BBB Over Public Land Sell-Off
Far-Left Comedian Blames Trump for Her Overeating, Alcohol Abuse, and Depression
Ex-Hochul and Cuomo Aide Arrested As Chinese Agent, Kash Patel Calls for Full...
Nowhere to Run: DeSantis’ 'Alligator Alcatraz' Targets Border Crisis with Swamp Security
Did You Catch This Awkward Moment at a WNBA Game This Week?
As Kamala Harris Slips in Support for 2028, Another Top Candidate Also Has...
Cotton Slams ODNI As Bloated Bureaucracy, Pushes Bill to Slash Waste and End...
OPINION

You Blew It! More Saving Will Ruin the Economy?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

“If everyone saved more, we’d have a problem.” – Robert Shiller

Last week, in promoting a new edition of “Irrational Exuberance,” Robert Shiller, a Nobel Prize-winning economist from Yale University, said he is encouraging his students to save more, because the “golden age of investing” is over and investors will need to save more to have enough for retirement.

Advertisement

Then, in an interview with Yahoo Finance, he nodded his head with approval when the interviewer said that saving more “would ruin the economy.” Shiller added, “If everybody saved more, then we’d have a problem.” The interviewer went on to say, “Shiller is referring to the idea that if everyone saved more, they wouldn’t be spending money on discretionary items and the U.S. economy is heavily dependent on consumer spending.”

Of course, this so-called “paradox of thrift” is nonsense and might only apply during periods of Great Depression when savings were stashed away as cash under a mattress or stayed idle in a bank account.

In today’s modern economy, nothing of the sort happens. If everyone saved more, the funds would be invested in the stock market, or in bank accounts where the funds would be invested in businesses.

There is actually no empirical evidence of a paradox of thrift. In fact, just the opposite is true. A St. Louis Fed study of a few years ago concluded that higher savings results in higher economic growth.

Advertisement

It also is not true that consumer spending dominates the U.S. economy.

My own work demonstrates that business spending (my B2B index) is almost twice the size of consumer spending in the United States, based on the new Gross Output statistics that the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) now is using.

Read my lead op-ed in the Wall Street Journal on this subject.

In short, saving more is a good idea, for individuals and for society.

In case you missed it, I encourage you to read my e-letter column from last week on Eagle Daily Investor about U.S. transportation infrastructure.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement