Yeah, Susie Wiles Went Nuclear in Her Vanity Fair Interview, but There's a...
USA Today Reporter Got Crushed for His Laughable Take on the 'Appeal to...
New FBI Memos Drop Bombshell About the Mar-a-Lago Ransacking
Trump Administration Just Made a Huge Move Against Drug Cartels
Gavin Newsom's Comms Guy Throws Tantrum Over Nicki Minaj Criticism
This Is What JD Vance Had to Say About That Vanity Fair Hit...
This Trump Administration Official Just Demolished Tim Walz Over Fraud Scandals
GOP Lawmakers Slam Critics of Airstrikes Against Venezuelan Boats
Dear New York Times: Jane Austen Does Not Need ‘X-Rated’ Help to Endure
Australia Dropped the Gun Control Ball With the Bondi Beach Terrorist
Let's Talk About This Little-Known Task Force Driving Up Healthcare Costs
Authorities Just Busted a Massive Home Depot Theft Ring Operating Across Nine States
Speaker Mike Johnson Just Ended the Democrats' Lies About Taxpayer-Funded Healthcare for I...
Wisconsin's Supreme Court Just Handed Catholic Charities a Major Win (and Dealt a...
The Quiet Crisis Consuming Young Men — and the People Getting Rich Off...
OPINION

Rewarding Bad Behavior

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
AP Photo/Adel Hana

At this writing, the "ceasefire" in Gaza continues while Hamas dribbles out hostages (who depart the territory amid the bellowing and threats of Palestinian civilians calling for their deaths). How long will this go on? As long as Hamas can stretch it out.

Advertisement

John Hinderaker over at Powerline blog has expressed concern that Israel may be losing its momentum in the war against the terrorists who attacked on Oct. 7, slaughtered 1,200-plus people, and took hundreds more hostage. As well, he might. If one wonders why Hamas (and their sister group Hezbollah) keeps up the relentless attacks on Israel, the answer should be obvious -- because it works; numerous commentators have remarked that the terrorists seem to be winning the "battle for hearts and minds."

Frankly, it isn't much of a battle. I'd wager that even Hamas did not anticipate the ease with which they could drum up support for their position that the slaughter of innocents in the most horrific ways imaginable is somehow "justified" as a mechanism for obtaining their purported political objectives. They are profiting from the ignorance of the American public and the widespread antisemitism that has taken root here, especially among so-called intellectuals and on college campuses.

These terrorists' tactics strike me as bloodier, more vicious, and more lethal versions of the schoolyard bully who hits another kid repeatedly; when the bullied kid finally gets fed up and punches back, the antagonizer runs to the recess monitor and demands that his victim be punished: "He hit me!" 

In another, more sensible era, grown-ups would have recognized the persistent provocation for what it was and told the bully to knock it off. But grown-ups with sense are harder to find in today's culture.

Despite Islamic fundamentalists' expressed intention to kill all Jews and wipe Israel off the map, our international "recess monitors" cluck their tongues and start talking again about "proportionality" and a "two-state solution," as if this conflict were merely a matter of land or economics.

Advertisement

Related:

HAMAS

It is not a fact that even former President Bill Clinton was forced to admit in 2016. It is a function of an ideology of hatred.

If Hamas stopped attacking Israel, they could cease being an "open-air prison" and have peace tomorrow. It's inscrutable that this isn't obvious to those demanding that Palestine must be free.

But in truth, it shouldn't surprise anyone that so many of America's leading lights are willing to reward Hamas' deplorable behavior effectively. That is the modus operandi these days.

When mobs looted and burned swaths of U.S. cities down in the 2020 riots, we were told that these "mostly peaceful" protests were legitimate acts against "systemic racism." States like New York and Illinois have eliminated cash bail for most crimes, putting hundreds of criminals back on the streets. And even in states where they have bail -- like Wisconsin -- state officials release dangerous criminals on de minimis bonds. Darrell Brooks, who killed six people and injured 62 others when he plowed into a Christmas parade in Waukesha, Wisconsin, two years ago, had been released on a paltry $1,000 bond just three weeks prior after having tried to run his girlfriend over with his car.

Millions of migrants pour across our southern border in violation of our immigration laws. There are few, if any, consequences, including for those who exploit the non-enforcement of immigration laws to traffic sex slaves, children, or drugs. Our Secretary of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas -- whose job it is to keep illegal immigrants out -- insists that they should be rewarded with amnesty and citizenship.

Advertisement

Hundreds of thousands of homeless people sleep in the streets of our major cities, many using drugs, urinating, and defecating in public places. City officials do nothing. (Except, apparently, when the leader of a communist country pays a visit.)

Every day, videos are posted to social media showing mobs of shoplifters brazenly stealing inventory from stores. Theft cost U.S. retailers more than $112 billion in 2022, an amount that more than doubled in just four years. Nothing is done. (California leads all states for the amount of stolen goods; the state reduced shoplifting of $950 or less to a misdemeanor just a few years ago.)

Cellphone videos also reveal the widespread student disrespect and violence in our schools. Last week, a riotous mob of high school students in Queens forced a Jewish teacher to hide in a locked office until police could escort her from the building safely.

Politicians run on promises to solve the country's problems, but once in office, double down on the policies that caused the problems in the first place. Why? Is it about money? I don't think so. I think it is far more fundamental than greed.

Proclaiming a belief in objective standards of right and wrong is unpopular. It is an acknowledgment that there are principles that supersede our own wants and decisions. This is anathema in an era when people are told that everyone can decide for themselves what is "right" and "wrong," "good" and "bad," "true" and "false."

This is nothing more than setting ourselves up as God.

The carnage wrought by these attitudes should have long since proven to even the biggest skeptic that an objective moral order is not merely a matter of personal preference, like deciding what dish to order at a restaurant. An objective moral order is scientifically rooted in human beings and, therefore, necessary for human society to flourish.

Advertisement

Like all demonstrable scientific laws, it is immutable. You can decide you "don't believe in" gravity, but if you throw yourself off a building, you'll be dead nevertheless.

Similarly, decisions to reward -- or at least not to sanction -- those who engage in destructive behavior have unpleasant results, including punishing those who do not.

The sooner we admit our errors, the sooner we can reclaim a civilized society.

To learn more about Laura Hollis and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement