Imagine escaping war—leaving behind bombs, Russian brutality, and shattered cities—only to be butchered on a train in America. That’s exactly what happened on August 22, 2025, when 23‑year‑old Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska was stabbed to death aboard Charlotte’s Lynx Blue Line. She fled tyranny for safety—and died because Democratic leadership in Charlotte prefers ideology over protection. Her accused killer, Decarlos Brown Jr., is a 34‑year‑old with 14 prior arrests and documented mental‑health issues, yet he was free to roam a public train. Days later, Charlotte’s Mayor Vi Lyles offered platitudes, pointed fingers at magistrates, then cruised to yet another Democratic primary win. Reward for failure. A campaign built on condolences while a young woman’s family plans a funeral.
None of this was unforeseeable. Prosecutors and judges knew Brown’s record. Transit officials knew the Blue Line’s known security gaps. Even now, state authorities are scrutinizing Charlotte’s transit safety and governance because the system so visibly failed the very people it exists to protect. This wasn’t an act of God. It was an act of government neglect that left a predator on the street and a refugee bleeding out on a rail car.
And Charlotte is not alone. Consider Chicago’s Blue Line massacre on September 2, 2024. Four riders were executed while sleeping—slaughtered in the predawn quiet on a train that should’ve been secure. Investigators say a suspect was cuffed soon after and charged with four counts of first‑degree murder. The tragedy wasn’t the product of mystery; it was the predictable outcome of a transit system treated like an honor‑system experiment in a city that treats enforcement like a dirty word. When you patrol less, prosecute less, and broadcast that consequences are optional, you invite the worst actors to test the theory.
Or look west to Portland. In July, at the Convention Center MAX station, a 67‑year‑old man—James Elliott—was knocked to the ground in an unprovoked attack. He later died of his injuries. Police arrested a 30‑year‑old suspect, Jordan Taylor Christ, within an hour. The part the euphemists hate to say out loud: Christ had a long rap sheet—two dozen prior arrests, with six involving assault. Two dozen. How many times does a city need to be warned before it decides that other people’s lives matter more than a repeat offender’s revolving‑door freedom? If a jurisdiction refuses to incapacitate predators who have demonstrated, repeatedly, that they will hurt people, it is choosing carnage as policy.
Recommended
This is the theme across Democrat‑run cities: compassion redefined as permissiveness, justice redefined as paperwork, safety redefined as a press conference. The bodies tell a different story. Policies aren’t speeches; they are outcomes. Bail laws that forbid judges from considering dangerousness are not lofty values—they are attack invitations. Declination policies that turn violent histories into footnotes are not reform—they are accelerants. And voters who keep rewarding leaders for presiding over decline are not victims of fate—they are participants in it.
Now compare that rot with what order looks like when grown‑ups take charge. Since President Trump launched a 30‑day federal surge to restore calm in Washington, D.C., violent crime has fallen sharply versus the same period last year, with homicides cut roughly in half over those weeks and more than two thousand arrests, hundreds of guns seized, and federal‑local coordination finally pulling in the same direction. Year‑to‑date, D.C.’s own dashboard shows homicides, robberies, and total violent crime running materially lower than 2024. Reasonable people can debate causation; what cannot be debated is that when leadership chooses enforcement, the predators lose oxygen and the innocent regain space to breathe.
This is the point the media will not make and that Democratic city halls refuse to admit: politics become policy, and policy becomes life or death. When a mayor shrugs at crime, her shrug becomes your nightmare on the train. When a prosecutor tiptoes around repeat violent offenders, his timidity becomes your child’s trauma and your spouse’s funeral. When a city council turns public transit into a rolling social experiment, your commute becomes the Petri dish.
Iryna Zarutska should be alive. So should the four who closed their eyes on a Chicago train and never opened them again. James Elliott should have finished his morning in Portland and gone home. The common denominator is not weather or chance. It is a theory of government that refuses to prioritize the safety of the innocent over the feelings of the dangerous. That theory kills people. And the elites who keep selling it—while they collect their paychecks and security details—do not deserve any more promotions from suffering voters.
This is why people of genuine conscience cannot sit on the sidelines. Silence isn’t neutral; it is permission. If citizens who know the difference between good and evil, order and chaos, keep staying home on Election Day, the experiment continues and the body count rises. But imagine the alternative. Imagine cities where safety is a right, not a luxury; where transit cars have watchful eyes and steady hands; where repeat offenders face certain consequence; where mental‑health care exists alongside enforcement instead of replacing it; where refugees find not only freedom but protection. That future is not utopian. It is available—when voters choose leaders who value life over ideology, law over chaos, good over evil. Choose wisely. Lives depend on it.
Editor’s Note: The Democrat Party has never been less popular as voters reject its soft-on-crime policies.
Help us continue exposing Democrats' plans to lead America down a dangerous path. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member