In the age of cyber warfare, global logistics chains, and contested sea lanes, the imperative to maintain a robust, sovereign maritime capability may seem like a throwback to the 20th century. But to dismiss it as such is to miss the strategic forest for the digital trees. During his first term, President Donald J. Trump, carved out a lesser-discussed but profoundly consequential legacy in American maritime policy—one that may prove pivotal in our era of great power competition.
This maritime resurgence is not merely about nostalgia or symbolism. It is grounded in the hard realities of geopolitics and our national resilience. As China accelerates its ambitions—constructing warships and commercial vessels at an industrious pace and projecting its influence across the Indo-Pacific and beyond—the United States can no longer afford to outsource its shipbuilding capacity, workforce expertise, or strategic maritime capacity.
To meet this moment, Trump’s administration has now advanced one of the most ambitious revitalization efforts in recent history. It began not with headlines, but with a sustained investment campaign aimed at reawakening America’s dormant shipyards. The administration’s much-discussed “One Big Beautiful Bill” authorizes record-breaking funding for the U.S. Navy and Coast Guard shipbuilding programs, ensuring that American shipyards have the contracts, capital, and confidence necessary to expand capacity and modernize operations.
In his March 4th address to Congress, President Trump set the tone, announcing the creation of a White House Office of Shipbuilding. This was not a ceremonial nod to industrial nostalgia—it was a structural commitment. Within weeks, the president signed an Executive Order titled Restoring America’s Maritime Dominance. The directive charged federal agencies with developing a coordinated Maritime Action Plan (MAP) to reinvigorate domestic shipbuilding and seafaring industries while explicitly linking those objectives to national security and economic sovereignty.
Nowhere is the marriage of industrial strategy and national defense more apparent than in the administration’s unwavering defense of the Jones Act, the 1920 law requiring that goods transported between U.S. ports be carried on American-built, American-owned, and American-crewed vessels. Critics, typically from foreign trade lobbies or neoliberal policy circles, have long sought to dismantle or sidestep the Jones Act. Yet under Trump, the Act became a centerpiece of the “America First” agenda.
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy echoed what many maritime experts have long understood but Washington too often ignored: the Jones Act is not just a shipping regulation—it’s a national security firewall. As House Majority Leader Steve Scalise put it, the Jones Act “prevents foreign ships from roaming throughout our inland waterways” and protects the homeland from “unknown foreign threats.” In a world where economic supply chains and strategic vulnerabilities often intersect at sea, the logic is unassailable.
The Jones Act is not merely theoretical. It supports approximately 650,000 American jobs, generates more than $150 billion in annual economic activity, and secures a domestic fleet of nearly 40,000 vessels. If it didn’t already exist, one senator quipped, Trump would have had to invent it. That may sound like hyperbole, but it reflects the legislation’s alignment with the broader Trump doctrine of strategic self-reliance.
That alignment has been more than rhetorical. In 2018, responding to a shortage of qualified American mariners and the impending collapse of a key domestic shipyard, the Trump administration launched a five-vessel initiative to construct cutting-edge training ships for State Maritime Academies. Known as the National Security Multi-Mission Vessel (NSMV) program, it was a lifeline for Philly Shipyard and a game-changer for maritime education. Today, with admissions surging and vessels like the NSMV Patriot State nearing delivery, that program stands as a template for future public-private shipbuilding collaborations.
In a more recent and highly symbolic development, the launch of the Acadia, the first-ever Jones Act-compliant subsea rock installation vessel, marks a turning point in America’s offshore construction capabilities. Built for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation, Acadia will be pivotal in undersea infrastructure, including offshore wind development and subsea cable protection—areas of growing strategic significance. That this vessel is being built in the U.S. and complies fully with the Jones Act is not just a technological milestone; it is a policy victory. It demonstrates that American shipyards can still deliver cutting-edge engineering under the constraints—and protections—of national maritime law.
Such developments reflect a broader understanding: true national strength is not merely measured in missiles and GDP, but in supply chains, skilled trades, and the ability to mobilize industrial capacity on short notice. As China builds what amounts to a floating empire and global adversaries exploit maritime vulnerabilities, Trump’s focus on restoring maritime dominance appears prescient. Strategic foresight, after all, is often the difference between deterrence and dependence.
The Trump-era maritime strategy, then, is not just an economic stimulus or a patriotic gesture—it is a national insurance policy. Just as one wouldn’t wait for a fire to buy smoke detectors, no prudent nation should wait for a crisis to rebuild its naval and commercial fleet infrastructure.
If the Jones Act is the keel of American maritime policy, then the revitalization of domestic shipbuilding is the hull, and visionary leadership is the engine. With programs like the NSMV and vessels like Acadia, the United States is laying the steel framework for a new era of maritime readiness. And while debates around tariffs and industrial policy may come and go, the principle endures: a sovereign nation must sail on its own ships.
In retrospect, President Trump’s maritime initiatives may be remembered less as economic policy and more as strategic statecraft—an effort not merely to “Make American Maritime Great Again,” but to ensure that the United States, like its ships, remains capable of weathering the storms ahead.
Julio Rivera is a business and political strategist, cybersecurity researcher, founder of ItFunk.Org, and a political commentator and columnist. His writing, which is focused on cybersecurity and politics, is regularly published by many of the largest news organizations in the world.
Editor's Note: President Trump is leading America into the "Golden Age." Help us continue to report on his successes by joining Townhall VIP and using promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member