Liz Warren Named As the Person Who Really Controlled the Biden Autopen
UK Prosecutors Charge Andrew and Tristan Tate With Rape, Human Trafficking
The Justice Department Just Launched an Investigation Into One of California's Sickest Pol...
Trump Confirms He Stopped a Major Military Strike —Here’s What We Know
Democrats Should Shut the Hell Up About Trump's Pardons
WINNING: DOGE Just Scored a Tremendous Victory in Federal Court
Inside the Closed-Door Meeting That Has ICE Officials Fearing for Their Jobs
Judge Jeanine Pirro Sworn in, Vows to Make DC Safe Again
Former DNC Chairman Jaime Harrison Sure Looks to Be in Disarray Over Biden
Homan Makes Fun of AOC Over Her Warning of ‘Consequences’
Dylan Mulvaney Landed Another Brand Deal Making a Mockery of Women
One Military Branch Just Banned All Testing on Dogs and Cats
Former CDC Director Believes Vaccine Makers Should Be Sued
Will the Biden Decline Scandal Hurt Democrats with Voters?
Why Shareholders Are Calling on Major Federal Contractor to Reverse Destructive DEI Course
OPINION

Minimum Wage Folly

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli

California now leads the nation in imposing dumb wage laws.

The state just raised the hourly minimum wage for fast food workers to $20.

Gov. Gavin Newsom said, "We saw the inequities. ... we had a responsibility to do more."

Advertisement

Unions pushed for the higher minimum, and in Democrat-run states, unions usually get what they want.

CNN announced, "Half a million California fast food workers will now earn $20 per hour!"

Gullible leftists at the Center for American Progress claim, "A higher minimum wage would boost millions of families out of poverty and further stimulate the economy."

Yippee! It's a happy cycle! Win-win.

But wait, if it's win-win, why just make the minimum $20? Why not $30? Or $100?

Because government requiring higher wages is not a win-win.

Interfering with market prices always creates nasty unintended consequences.

Frederic Bastiat, in his work "That Which Is Seen, and That Which Is Not Seen," points out that there are always seen and unseen consequences when government force impacts economic decisions. "Almost always," he wrote, "the immediate consequence is favorable, the ultimate consequences are fatal."

In this case, the immediate consequence is that existing workers get a raise. Great. That's the seen. That's what the media, unions and Center for American Progress see. But the unseen effect is bigger, and worse:

No. 1: Thousands of Californians have already lost jobs because some restaurants closed. Others lost income because their employer cut worker hours. The chain El Pollo Loco cut employees' hours by 10%.

Advertisement

Pizza Hut announced that they will lay off more than a thousand delivery drivers. One, Michael Ojeda, understandably asked, "What's the point of a raise if you don't have a job?"

No. 2: Workers who still have jobs will lose them because now their employers have more incentive to automate. Chipotle just created a robot that makes burrito bowls. Even CNN acknowledged, "Some restaurants are replacing (fast food workers) with kiosks."

No. 3: Prices go up.

The day Newsom signed the bill, he was asked, "Can Californians expect the prices of their McDonald's and Starbucks to go up?"

Newsom deceitfully replied, "I've heard that rhetoric before. And it didn't happen!"

Nonsense. It did happen. It always happens when government forces wage increases. In this case, Starbucks prices have increased as much as 15%. Customers will pay about $200/year more for their coffee. A chicken burrito at Chipotle will cost up to 8% more.

No. 4: Perhaps the worst unseen harm from minimum wage laws is that young and unskilled people won't even be hired. They won't gain valuable experience from a first job at a fast food restaurant.

In 2014, when Seattle politicians raised the minimum wage to $15 -- I asked some teenagers what a higher minimum wage could do for them.

Advertisement

"Minimum wage actually hurts my chances of getting employed," said one, Rigel Noble-Koza. "If I cost more, why would a company take a risk on hiring me? They'll hire the worker with more experience instead."

Another, Dillon Hodes, talked about his friend who had fast work but got her hours cut because "she was young and inexperienced."

Of course, these students were unusual. They were finalists in a Stossel in the Classroom contest. They are not economically ignorant. They knew to look for the unseen.

If only politicians were that smart.

Government price fixing like minimum wage laws hurt the young and the poor, the very people these laws are supposed to help.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement