In a free society, the foundation of good governance rests on reason, facts, and a shared understanding of reality. When elected officials abandon these principles in favor of ideological theatrics or emotional appeals, they not only betray their constituents — they undermine the very institutions they were chosen to uphold.
Rep. Kristine Reeves of Washington recently made headlines for comparing legislation that protects girls' sports and locker rooms to racial segregation. During a committee hearing, she invoked her grandfather's experience as a Black man denied access to athletic opportunities, suggesting that barring biological males from female sports teams and facilities is akin to Jim Crow-era discrimination. This comparison is not just flawed — it's offensive to both history and logic.
Segregation was a system of oppression based on race, an immutable characteristic that has no bearing on athletic performance or physical safety. The current debate over transgender participation in sports is rooted in biological realities — differences in strength, speed, and endurance that can create unfair advantages and compromise safety. To equate these concerns with racial exclusion is to trivialize the suffering of those who endured real segregation and to ignore the legitimate rights of female athletes.
Statements like Reeves' reflect a troubling trend in modern politics: the elevation of ideology over evidence, and emotion over reason. It's not just about one misguided analogy — it's about the broader erosion of common sense in public discourse. When lawmakers conflate protecting girls' privacy with bigotry or suggest that biological distinctions are irrelevant in competitive sports, they reveal a dangerous disconnect from reality.
Recommended
This isn't the first time we've seen such rhetorical overreach. Senator Tim Kaine once remarked that "God-given rights" are dangerous — a statement that defies the very premise of American liberty. Our nation was founded on the belief that rights are inherent, not granted by government. To call that dangerous is to misunderstand the essence of constitutional democracy.
These kinds of statements aren't just intellectually lazy — they're politically reckless. They fuel division, distort public understanding, and distract from real issues. They also raise serious questions about the judgment and fitness of those who make them. In a time when our country faces complex challenges — from economic uncertainty to global conflict — we need leaders who can think clearly, speak honestly, and legislate responsibly.
The consequences of abandoning common sense are already visible. Girls are losing scholarships and competitive opportunities to biologically male athletes. Parents are being silenced when they raise concerns about privacy and safety. And voters are being told that their desire for fairness is tantamount to hate.
We saw this firsthand when Virginia Lt. Governor Winsome Earle-Sears addressed a group of concerned parents about the need to protect their daughters from an adult male who had entered girls' locker rooms and exposed himself. As she spoke, a protester held up a sign that read, "Hey Winsome, If Trans can't share your bathroom, then Blacks can't share my water fountain." The comparison was not only absurd — it was a grotesque distortion of the real horrors of Jim Crow segregation. Equating parental concern for their daughters' safety with racial apartheid is not just intellectually dishonest; it's morally bankrupt.
This is not progress — it's regression masquerading as inclusion.
To be clear, transgender individuals have constitutional rights like everyone else. But those rights must coexist with the rights of others — not override them. A truly inclusive society finds ways to accommodate diversity without erasing boundaries that serve legitimate purposes. That's the balance we must strive for — not the false equivalence peddled by politicians like Reeves.
It's time for voters to demand better. We need representatives who understand the difference between compassion and capitulation, between inclusion and intrusion. We need leaders who can defend fairness without fear, and who recognize that protecting girls' sports and spaces is not an act of exclusion — it's an act of integrity.
The stakes are too high to tolerate intellectual shortcuts or ideological extremism. When lawmakers compare locker room policies to segregation, or dismiss foundational rights as dangerous, they reveal a worldview that is not just misguided — it's incompatible with the principles of a free and rational society.
Let us be clear: common sense is not hate. Biological reality is not bigotry. And protecting children is not oppression.
If we want to preserve freedom, fairness, and reason in our public institutions, we must start by holding our leaders accountable — not just for what they do, but for what they say. Because words matter. And when those words betray logic, history, and truth, it's not just a gaffe — it's a warning.
Let's heed that warning. Let's restore common sense to the public square. And let's ensure that the next generation of leaders is guided not by rage or rhetoric — but by reason, responsibility, and respect for the truth.
George Landrith is the President of the Frontiers of Freedom Institute and the author of "Let Freedom Ring… Again: Can Self-Evident Truths Save America from Further Decline?"
Join the conversation as a VIP Member