Oh, So That's Who Signed Off on the FBI Spy Operation Into the...
Chuck Schumer Is About to Be Taken Behind the Barn Over This Tweet
Watch Trump Roast a Reporter Over This Silly Question About the East Room...
Trump Just Called Off Planned Immigration 'Surge' In This City – for Now
Trump Administration Is Preparing Unprecedented Action Against Drug Cartels
Letitia James' ICE Snitch Line Will Backfire on Democrats
The 'Unbiased' Jon Karl Has Another Anti-Trump Book Coming Out, and Trump's Tearing...
Some Democrats Are Sour on Mandela Barnes Running for Wisconsin Governor
Another Day, Another Blow to Platner's Image
Anti-ICE Protestor Who Called for Violence a 'Human Rights Award' Winner
Michael Wolff Launches Lawsuit Against Melania Trump After Refusal to Retract Epstein Comm...
Candace Owens Hits a New Low, and Accuses Trump of Assassinating Charlie Kirk
Eric Adams Endorses Andrew Cuomo
Trump Says Ford, General Motors Thanked Him for Tariffs on Mid, Large-Size Trucks
ICE Arrests Two Illegal Alien Fugitives Wanted for Murder of Texas Woman
OPINION

Rigs to Reef: A Conservation Program Environmentalists Shouldn't Oppose

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
AP Photo/Gerald Herbert, File

On Tuesday evening, I attended the Washington, D.C., premiere of the new documentary “Steel to Sanctuary: The Rigs to Reef Story” at the Andrew Mellon Auditorium. The event was organized by the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation (CSF), a bipartisan organization that protects and enhances access and opportunities for anglers, hunters, and other outdoor recreationists. 

Advertisement

The film, produced and sponsored by Arena Energy LLC, explores a federal program called Rigs-to-Reef (RTR). RTR takes decommissioned oil rigs, that already support marine life with structure, into sanctuaries. RTR’s work is well demonstrated in the Gulf of America and partially in coastal California.

Featured speakers at the premiere included House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Bruce Westerman (R-AR), Congressman Mike Ezell (R-MS), and Governor Jeff Landry (R-LA). 

Governor Landry, an avid sportsman who frequently fishes in the Gulf of America, touted RTR as “an American issue” and “a conservation issue” at the event.

In 1979, Exxon initially experimented with RTR through a subsea structure. Afterwards, RTR took off following the enactment of the National Fishing Enhancement Act of 1984. Per the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE), a subsidiary of the Department of Interior (DOI) that oversees RTR, the NFEA “recognizes the social and economic values in developing artificial reefs, establishes national standards for artificial reef development, provides for creation of a National Artificial Reef Plan, and provides for establishment of a reef-permitting system.” 

There are currently three methods for decommissioning oil rigs: the tow and place method, topple and place method, and partial removal method. The last method, partial removal, is described as the “most successful” method at “maintaining the already established marine habitat and organisms with the least disturbance.” During partial removal, the top portion of the oil rig is severed at a “permitted navigational depth” at 80 to 85 feet to allow for commercial barges and other vessels to pass through. Then the rig is “placed on the sea floor next to the base of the remaining structure.”

Advertisement

The documentary explained that artificial reefs created by the RTR program serve as a carbon sync and act as sanctuaries for marine life–including critically-endangered fish species. In fact, it’s been argued that decommissioned oil rigs are among the world’s best fish habitats. That’s why this underappreciated conservation program is very popular with conservationists, locals, the oil and gas industry, and commercial and recreational anglers. It’s a win-win for all stakeholders involved.

But bureaucracy and opposition from environmentalists, who often advocate full removal of decommissioned rigs, imperil the future of this wildly successful effort. Environmentalists, especially those in California, have cited factors like pollution, proliferation of invasive species, safety hazards, and liability as reasons to oppose the conversion of rigs to fish habitat.

This tension has played out in California, where rigs-to-reef efforts have partially succeeded. In 2010, then-California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed Assembly Bill (AB) 2503 - or California Marine Life Legacy Act -  into law. AB 2503 allowed the conversion of decommissioned rigs into artificial reefs if they were found to be a "net benefit" on the local environment “compared to removal of the facility from the marine environment.” It also established the California Endowment for Marine Preservation. 

Ahead of AB 2503 becoming law, some legacy environmentalist groups - including Audubon California, California League of Conservation Voters, the Monterey Bay Aquarium, Ocean Conservancy, Oceana, and The Nature Conservancy - supported AB 2503. But the Santa Barbara based Environmental Defense Center (EDC) claimed rigs-to-reef is “misguided” and “not supported by any scientific evidence.” California State University-Long Beach (CSULB) researchers, however, called efforts to wholly remove decommissioned rigs dangerous to conservation efforts. CSULB’s Dr. Chris Lowe, PhD., warned, “If you remove these oil platforms by blowing them up, you’re going to wipe out a huge part of the population of economically important fish.”

Advertisement

As of this writing, about 600 oil rigs in the Gulf of America have been fully converted into artificial reefs. Yet, only 1,100 of 7,000 original platforms remain. Sadly, only 20% of rigs currently slated to be taken out of production will be donated to the RTR program. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) claims DOI “only holds about $3.5 billion in bonds from companies to cover a potential cost of $40-$70 billion.”

Streamlining the decommissioning process, one frequently marked by a two- to four-year slog, could drastically improve RTR’s effectiveness and convert more rigs into suitable marine habitat. And at no loss to U.S. taxpayers. 

The documentary alluded to three remedies to bolster and improve RTR: reforming the NFEA permitting process down from years to months, reefing in place, and allocating more funding for state conservation programs. The elected officials in attendance at Tuesday’s premiere, including Rep. Mike Ezell (R-MS), alluded to potential legislation during the 119th Congress to address the bureaucratic slog facing BSEE, Army Corps of Engineers, and Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) involved in the decommissioning process.

Townhall readers interested in watching the documentary can head to RigsToReef.com to learn more about this critically important conservation program. 

Editor's Note: President Trump is leading America into the "Golden Age" as Democrats try desperately to stop it.  

Help us continue to report on President Trump's successes. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement