Seeing the Dems Defend Platner Is Glorious to Watch
Former Trump Communications Operative Doled Out a Crazy Take About Graham Platner on...
CBS News' Shakeup and the Future of the Mainstream Press
Lithuanian Ambassador Varvuolis Reflects on First Year in Washington
Our Billionaires Kind of Stink
When Cowardly Journalists Abuse Anonymous Sourcing
The View’s Joy Behar Would Rather Smear Trump Than Help Americans Afford Medicine
Which Party Will Recover First From Its Current Self-Harm?
Randi Weingarten Is the Real Threat to Public Education
Election Day Does Not Wait for Litigation
Free Speech Comes With Responsibility
Four Senate Republicans Join Democrats to Sink Save America Act Vote
Former Arkansas Nonprofit Director Sentenced for $1.7 Million Fraud Scheme
American Who Lived in China Pleads Guilty to Acting as CCP Spy Inside...
OPINION

Trust Fund Commies

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Trust Fund Commies
AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty

The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) has a class problem that its own rhetoric is designed to obscure. Its rising stars – Zohran Mamdani, son of a Columbia professor and an acclaimed filmmaker; the Ivy-credentialed activists staffing progressive nonprofits; the heirs animating the movement's core – reveal a pattern the movement cannot honestly explain. The face of American socialism is increasingly young, college-credentialed, and conspicuously well-bred. This is not coincidence. It is structure.

Advertisement

The pattern is older than the DSA. Engels co-authored the "Communist Manifesto" while running his father's textile mill. Marx married into Prussian nobility and lived on Engels's industrial fortune. Lenin's father held hereditary status under the tsar. Castro was the son of one of Cuba's largest landowners. The proletariat has rarely led its own revolutions; the bourgeoisie's disaffected sons have. The pattern is not accidental.

What socialism reliably produces is not equality but a closed caste. The Soviet nomenklatura had its sealed stores, hospitals, and dachas. The Chinese Communist Party's "princelings" – Xi Jinping among them – inherited position as straightforwardly as any Habsburg. North Korea has produced three generations of Kims; the Castros gave Cuba six decades of dynastic rule. Every long-running communist regime has frozen its founding elite into a hereditary aristocracy. The system that promised to abolish class only ever abolished the class mobility that threatens its rulers.

The free market is the most ruthlessly meritocratic mechanism humans have devised. Joseph Schumpeter called it "creative destruction" – the process by which yesterday's titans are unseated by tomorrow's strivers, the immigrant eclipsing the inherited fortune. Capitalism does not care who your father was. It will take your standing and hand it to a kid from Queens with a better idea. For someone who suspects that he is exactly the unearned aristocrat capitalism is built to dethrone, this is a mortal threat.

Socialism is the escape. Replace the market's verdict with the committee's, and the credentials, connections, and cultural fluencies accumulated since prep school become decisive. The Harvard PhD is not displaced by an HVAC contractor in a system that allocates by ideological vocabulary and bureaucratic capture. The nonprofit, the agency, the university, the foundation – the institutions that the inherited elite already dominates – are precisely the ones a socialist order empowers.

Advertisement

But empowerment requires a mandate, and the inherited radical cannot rule in the name of his own privilege. So he manufactures a constituency and crowns himself its head. This is the function of the grievance apparatus: he survives by persuading others they are victims of an irredeemable society, and that he, the credentialed interpreter of their suffering, is the one fit to lead them out. His status depends on the permanence of their victimhood. A grievance resolved liquidates his position; a striver who climbs out on his own refutes the premise. He is therefore invested in keeping the underclass aggrieved and convinced the ladder is rigged – because the moment they believe they can climb it, they no longer need him.

This is the buried logic behind the doctrine that the bourgeoisie are the villains. The middle class is denounced not because it oppresses the worker but because it is the living refutation of the whole arrangement – the shopkeeper, the contractor, the immigrant family that built a business from nothing, the people who prove grievance is not destiny.

It is why the same movement has rallied behind Graham Platner in Maine, the progressive favorite endorsed by Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. Platner campaigns as a "working-class Mainer," an oysterman in salt-stained authenticity – and the costume does the work. His grandfather, Warren Platner, was a celebrated architect who designed the dining room atop the World Trade Center. His father, a Dartmouth-educated attorney, has given some $60,000 to Democrats – and lent his son $200,000 to buy his house, a purchase Platner long implied was financed by the VA. He attended the $75,000-a-year Hotchkiss School. This is not the biography of a man the market forgot. It is a man insulated from it, now asking working Mainers to make him their tribune on the strength of a victimhood he has never lived.

Advertisement

The instinct suffices without the script. Socialism is the insurance policy: dressed as equality, sold as liberation, and structured, always, to keep the right families on top.

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Townhall's conservative reporting that takes on the radical Left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement