President Trump Reveals What We All Suspected About the 2020 Election in Primetime...
Peggy Flanagan Wants to Make Kids Whole. She Can Start With Kids Harmed...
Mashed Out: Katie Porter Says She's Done With Politics Following Failed Gubernatorial Camp...
Possible Maine Senate Candidate Troy Jackson Just Called to 'Get Rid' of People...
There Is a Case of the DNC Hiding Its Financials and the Press...
Rep. Summer Lee Admits She Wants More Black Doctors, Even If They're Unqualified
Democrats May Love Socialism, but They Can't Get Enough Luxury on the Campaign...
Why We Need the SAVE America Act
Trump Declassifies Election Documents: Here's What We Know So Far
Two Seattle-Area Men Sentenced for Trafficking Drugs Near Homeless Encampments
Former TD Bank Employee Sentenced to 46 Months for $474 Million Money Laundering...
'Complete Fraud': NRCC Blasts NY Dem Josh Riley Over NRDC Donations
Massachusetts Man Sentenced for Collecting Dead Beneficiary's Social Security Checks for Y...
Former Federal Reserve Adviser Sentenced to 38 Months for Lying About Ties to...
Brandon Gill Introduces Legislation Requiring Naturalized Citizens Speak English
OPINION

The Higher-Education Version of the Government-Screws-Up-Everything Chronicles

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
The Higher-Education Version of the Government-Screws-Up-Everything Chronicles

I’ve previously shared an amazing chart that shows how more government spending on public schools has yielded zero positive results.

Well, it seems that government spending on colleges and universities also leaves a lot to be desired.

Advertisement

Three academics investigated the relationship between higher-education spending and economic performance and it turns out that this perverse form of redistribution from poor to rich is counterproductive. Here’s the key sentence from the abstract.

Results from a series of fixed-effects regressions using a 1992-2002 panel of state-level data indicate that increased spending on higher education generally exhibits a relatively large negative effect on private sector employment or gross state product growth when the increase in education spending is financed through own-source revenue.

Yet Obama and most of the other politicians in Washington want to increase the subsidies for colleges and universities – even though the macroeconomic effects are dismal.

But I guess that doesn’t matter since politicians seem more concerned about creating more comfortable lives for unproductive professors and bloated school bureaucracies.

By the way, let’s not forget that students also suffer. As the federal government has squandered more money on higher education, colleges and universities have responded by jacking up tuition and fees, leaving more and more students deeply in debt.

Obama’s Campaign Strategy, Revealed in Two Cartoons

Actually, the title is an exaggeration. I think this Chuck Asay cartoon best captures the Obama political game plan, but I did enjoy this pair of Glen McCoy cartoons (and, given Obama’s weak track record on the economy, I do think there is a lot of truth to the notion that the White House would rather the election be determined by social issues).

Advertisement

The above cartoon reminds me of some of the amusing material that was put together when Sandra Fluke was getting her 15 minutes of fame for demanding subsidized birth control. You can enjoy some of that humor by clicking here, here, and here.

Here’s the second McCoy cartoon.

For what it’s worth, I don’t think it’s a role of government to sanction any kind of marriage (or to persecute people based on their beliefs), so I definitely think this issue is a distraction.

P.S. As far as I can remember, I’ve only shared one other McCoy cartoon, which can be seen here.

P.P.S. Here’s another Asay cartoon about the election, though note my important caveats.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement