Cooked: Thom Tillis Is Not Running for Re-Election
Whatever This Is, It's Being Called a Nazi Rally. Here's Why.
Scott Jennings Couldn't Let This Fake News Go Unchallenged During this CNN Panel
Trump Body Slammed Thom Tillis Yesterday
LATEST: Senate Clears Key Procedural Vote on Trump Reconciliation Bill Outright
How Could Anyone Support These People?
America Wins, Cry Harder
The Dog That Never Barked
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 274: ‘Psalm Summer 2025’ Begins with Three of...
An Avalanche of Congressional Investigations Need to be Initiated or Intensified
DeSantis Issues Warning to 'Alligator Alcatraz' Protesters: Block Traffic, Get Hit—That’s...
Jeffries Slams Trump for Abandoning Obama's Iran Strategy, That Included Sending Tehran Pa...
Radical Socialist Mamdani Could Trigger NYC’s Financial Collapse and Skyrocket Living Cost...
IDF Kills Key Hamas and Hezbollah Operatives
Trump Scores Win As OBBB Clears Procedural Vote Hurdle After Hours Long Showdown
OPINION

Hostess Bankruptcy: What Role Did Policy Play?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

The demise of Hostess and Twinkies is not a national emergency, but it is certainly sad when a major business goes under and thousands of people lose their jobs.

Advertisement

If federal and state policymakers want to play a useful role here, they should study why Hostess couldn’t make a go of it. Were there tax or regulatory factors that stood in the way of the company earning a decent rate of return?

Unions were an important factor that pushed up the firm’s costs and reduced its operational efficiency. The policy reform here is obvious for people who appreciate market economics: repeal America’s coercive union laws. If policymakers don’t kill so-called collective bargaining, these rules will keep on killing companies.

Sugar apparently played a role in the demise of Hostess, as discussed in this excellent CSM article. Food manufacturers that use a lot of sugar are at a competitive disadvantage in the United States because federal import barriers on sugar substantially push up prices for that production input.

Perhaps taxes played a role as well. Income taxes may not have been a big factor if Hostess wasn’t earning profits in recent years. However, I suspect as a manufacturing firm, the company payed substantial property taxes. In this study, I discuss the anti-investment effects of state/local property taxes on U.S. businesses.

Advertisement

Some Democrats and Republicans may use Hostess as a political football, and some politicians will probably want to bail out the company. A more constructive response would be to find out what governments are doing that makes it so hard for some manufacturing firms to survive in this country.

This work by Cato Institute is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement