We Might Have Had Another Shooting Involving Federal Immigration Officers in Portland
Can JD Vance Be Present for Every White House Press Briefing? He Masterful...
Family Member of Woman Who Tried to Ram ICE Agents in Minneapolis Had...
DOGE Just Updated Its Website. Here's How Much It's Saved.
Kicking Off the Year With Press Derangement, Contradictions, and Slanted Approaches to Sob...
Rep. Emily Randall Knows Who Congress Should Really Target for Fraud, and It's...
'Is Our Children Learning:' Check Out This Sign at the Domestic Terrorist Rally...
America First Lawmakers Must Punch Back As Europe Forces Importation of Harmful Regulation...
Is America's Iraq Syndrome Over?
You Won't Believe What this Socialist CA Mayor Said About the Bondi Beach...
JD Vance Predicts a Rough Road for Democrats in 2028
Labtech to Pay $6.8M, Plead Guilty to Anti-Kickback Violations
U.S. House Approves Obamacare Subsidy Extension as Some Republicans Break With Party
Cincinnati Case Unseals Alleged $27M Drug Money Laundering Operation
Marriott Employee Fired After Allegedly Doxxing ICE Agents on Social Media
OPINION

Republicans Need to Get to Know Their Enemies on Income Inequality

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

“Know thine enemy.” Uttered most famously a millennia and a half ago by famed warrior/philosopher Sun Tzu, the advice holds up well, even, and especially, when the battles are ideological. So what is the thinking behind the right’s utter refusal to actually engage with the left’s actual position on inequality?

Advertisement

The Federalist’s Ben Domenech wants us to know that in reality, inequality doesn’t matter. Of course what “matters” is entirely subjective. It would make more sense for Ben to try to persuade those who think it does why they shouldn’t. But that would require that Ben understood why inequality matters to people.

Here’s his summation of his opponent’s view:

The left continues to operate on an a priori assumption that income inequality/wealth concentration is a bad thing, because of those riches backstroking through their money. But that’s just a jealousy trope.

In fact, Googleing “income inequality” brings up a host of non-jealousy related reasons to care about it. One reason is that it hurts economic growth when the rich see their incomes rise but the poor don’t. The reason? The poor spend their extra wages, unlike the wealthy. Another reason is that income inequality hurts class mobility by making it more difficult for kids to go to college.

It may be that saving and investing are just as good, if not better, for economic growth than spending. And I tend to believe that college is generally extremely overrated as a tool for mobility.

But to dismiss concerns as simple class warfare is unhelpful.

Advertisement

According to Pew Research, “Americans in the upper fifth of the income distribution earn 16.7 times as much as those in the lowest fifth — by far the widest such gap among the 10 advanced countries in the Pew Research Center’s 2013 global attitudes survey.”

This matters to Democrats, but not Republicans. Pew again:

More than half (55%) of Republicans said the economic system is fair to most people, but majorities of Democrats (75%) and independents (63%) said it favors the wealthy. And 61% of Democrats and 50% of independents said the gap was a very big problem, versus only 28% of Republicans.

Here’s where the Republican messaging machine could go Sun Tzu on the Democrats and win converts. Forty-five percent of Republicans and the vast majority of Democrats and independents said the economic system “favors the wealthy.” This is true! From licensure requirements to tax breaks to onerous regulations to the incredibly regressive payroll tax, which takes a huge chunk out of your first dollar earned and actually has a cap, like it or not, government economic policies shape our economy and many of these policies absolutely favor the wealthy.

Republicans get trapped into thinking that because some level of inequality is a feature of capitalism, we shouldn’t care about it. And I sympathize with the view that a rising tide lifts all boats, so the focus should be on growing the pie, not making sure it’s divided evenly.

Advertisement

But it’s no disavowal of capitalism to admit that the current levels of inequality aren’t right, fair, or the result of the free-market at work. For example, if creative destruction weren’t thwarted by bailouts, we’d probably wouldn’t see CEOs paid many multiples of worker compensation to preside over failing firms.

It’s the defense the free market deserves to point this stuff out, instead of misrepresenting why people care about it in the first place. Maybe, in a truly free market, inequality wouldn’t matter to most people. We’re not in one. Admitting that fact is the first step to getting on the same page.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement