Jill Biden Was Enraged About Her Husband's Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
Police Seemed to Have Known the Emergency Call Targeting Amy Coney Barrett Was...
Scott Bessent Dropped Quite a Zinger on This Question Yesterday
NM Democrat Governor Probably Said the Dumbest Thing Regarding Winning Elections
The Media Have Cracked the Case on Who's Paying to Clean Up D.C.
DHS Head Markwayne Mullin Vows Law and Order Will Prevail Against NJ Anti-ICE...
Democrats Are Soft on Crime, but Hard on Law-Abiding Citizens
'We Did Not Vanish.' Greek Media Outlet Slams Christopher Nolan's Diverse 'Odyssey'
Francesca Hong Knows Her Campaign for Governor Is About to Crash and Burn
Even Politico Admits the Democrats' Weaponization Tax Scheme Is Legally Dubious
A Kenyan Court Just Nixed the U.S. Ebola Quarantine Plan
We've Now Entered the 'Islam Is Part of the Fabric of America' Phase...
Maximum Transparency, Ultimate Accountability
Trans Student Protected Over 9-Year-Old Girl by Massachusetts School Principal
Trump Fires Back After Jill Biden's Debate Night 'Stroke' Fears
OPINION

The Political Instant Replay

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
The Political Instant Replay
AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein

In sports, the instant replay was invented and first used by a man named Tony Verna on the Dec. 7, 1963, broadcast of the Army-Navy football game on CBS.

The political "instant replay" has no single author or starting date, but its overuse has produced few resolutions of the major problems confronting the country. What it has produced is a deepening cynicism about politics and so much else.

Advertisement

Too many Americans now see their fellow Americans who are of a different party or persuasion as a bigger enemy than Iran or Russia. Long-term friendships have been destroyed over whether one loves or hates President Trump. At least the sports instant replay usually leads to the affirming or overturning of a decision by the referee. The political instant replay solves nothing, even when the "players" are shown to be wrong. The result in too many cases has been political paralysis.

Cable news and more than a few newspapers are increasingly obsessed with the November elections, as if they will somehow change the political game. We are bombarded with the "truth" that the party that controls the White House is bound to lose seats in Congress, although there have been exceptions. Voters who are angry at President Trump for whatever reason had best be careful what they wish for.

Despite his occasional bad demeanor and crude language, Trump has succeeded where other presidents and Congresses have failed. Do Democrats want to run on a platform of reopening the southern border? Allowing more people from many nations and possibly terrorists to cross the border in violation of our immigration laws would also increase the number of deadly drugs that have killed thousands of Americans. Imagine the effect instant replays of workers tearing down the wall and watching a flood of people pour across would have when a majority of voters say they approve of border control.

Advertisement

Would Democrats, should they regain House and Senate majorities, continue to back biological males playing on female sports teams and using locker rooms and restrooms restricted to women and girls? Would their party continue to support gender reassignment surgery for prison inmates with taxpayers footing the bill? Would their opposition to showing identification before voting and proof of citizenship before registering continue? All of these are "80-20" issues, in some cases higher.

What about taxes? Would Democrats run on raising taxes when it's the spending that needs to be cut to reduce the unsustainable $38 trillion debt? Would Democrats, whose party created Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, lead the way in reforming these programs before they run out of money (estimated to be in seven years for Social Security) and benefits are substantially cut, or taxes are substantially raised, or both?

It doesn't take a soothsayer to predict Democrats would seek revenge on President Trump by again impeaching him, possibly more than once, though he will have fewer than two years left in office and the Senate, even with a Democrat majority, would not likely convict him and remove him from office.

The problem with political instant replays is that few, if any, problems are solved. It's all about the politicians, not the people. Ultimately, they are not completely at fault. We are, because we keep electing the same people, expecting a different outcome.

Advertisement

Voters, especially the low- information kind, are guilty of creating the political instant replay. As long as we keep re-running the tape, nothing will change.

Readers may email Cal Thomas at tcaeditors@tribpub.com. Look for Cal Thomas' latest book "A Watchman in the Night: What I've Seen Over 50 Years Reporting on America" (HumanixBooks).

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical Left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement