Here's What Shocked a Former MSNBC Analyst About Erika Kirk's Heartbreaking Address
The ‘Progressive’ Left – The ‘Democratic’ Party – Has Shown You Exactly Who...
Spanberger Faces Questions As Chesterfield School Board Member Urged to Resign Over Charli...
Trustee Resigns As Oxford Union Faces Backlash After President-Elect Celebrates Charlie Ki...
South Carolina Rep. Joe Wilson Introduces Bill to Re-Impose Jackson-Vanik Sanctions on Rus...
I Am a Yankee Doodle Dandy
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 285: Archaeology Proves King David a Historical Figure...
UN General Assembly Could Mark a Turning Point on Iran
Feds Probe Left-Wing Groups for Possible Ties to Charlie Kirk Killing as One...
Charlie Kirk’s Assassination and the Rising Tide of Left-Wing Political Violence
The Voice of a Mother
How Trump’s Tariffs Helped Thwart a War in Southeast Asia
Charlie Kirk Killed By Extremist—David Hogg Makes It About Himself
DOJ Declares School Dissent Protected Under First Amendment
'We Are Charlie Kirk!' South Koreans Take to the Streets in Global Show...
OPINION

‘Trump's Not [being] Led Down a Path by Anyone’

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

ATLANTA -- From my Skype-seat at the White House briefing room on March 16, 2017, I asked this question: "Many conservatives are worried that President Trump is being led by Speaker Ryan down the wrong path toward health care reform. Please respond to that."

Advertisement

White House press secretary Sean Spicer said that "Trump is not going to be led down a path by anyone."

I beg to differ. I believe Trump has been convinced that the congressional Republicans’ plan is the best option that can pass the House and the Senate.

There are four main problems with this proposed health care law.

First, while the federal government may save between $300-400 billion over the next few years if the law is enacted, the burden will shift to the states to pick up a bigger cost for Medicaid funding. The individual states don't have the power of the printing press as does the federal government and this burden will be more strenuous on the citizens as a result.

Second, I don’t believe in the Obamacare subsidies and I still don't believe in healthcare tax credits. If someone wants a healthcare tax credit, that should be done exclusively through health savings account. Otherwise, it doesn't matter what you call it. A tax credit is still a de facto government handout that requires one class of American citizens to pay (or sacrifice) for the healthcare of another.

Third, there should be two healthcare systems. The first should be the private market where individuals and families pay for their own health care because they can afford it. For the people who are not fortunate enough to afford health insurance premiums, we should expand Medicaid to make sure that everyone has access to coverage. In that case their monthly premium payments should be based on a means test.

Advertisement

If someone is receiving the same healthcare at a significant discount (via tax credit or subsidy) as someone who is paying the full amount out of their own pocket, the former is likely to abuse that system.

Finally, healthcare costs will not go down under the congressional Republicans' plan. In fact, I believe that healthcare costs will continue to rise no matter what President Trump and the Republicans do. The truth that the American people need to hear is that the best lawmakers can possibly do is decelerate the rising cost of healthcare premiums in the near future.

This past week, Georgia Sen. Purdue commented that he believes Republicans might be best served to "slow down."  In government, it's commonplace that elected officials and bureaucrats love checking boxes.

New healthcare plan complete: "check!"

While I do think the Republicans’ plan is far better than Obamacare it still leaves a lot to be desired.

 If a family is paying $1,000 per month for health insurance, another family should not get the same insurance through tax credits for several hundred dollars less. America is built on the premise that you have to earn premium benefits or sacrifice those desires and needs until you do.

Without the ‘carrot at the end of the stick’ there is nothing to create drive and discipline.

I do believe we have a social and moral responsibility to provide healthcare options to people with limited income resources so that everyone can receive quality care and preventative treatment.

Advertisement

In many cases, giving unearned access to premium healthcare options leads to excessive emergency room visits, unnecessary doctor visits and abuse of access to prescription drugs.

The private market generally competes for business from individuals who can afford to pay a premium for better quality and thus are more responsible with their use of it.

While many may charge this viewpoint as elitist, it's quite the contrary. I'm simply saying that until someone exhibits the discipline, personal responsibility and perseverance to 'earn' the best money can buy they shouldn't be given unfettered access through subsidy or tax credit.

 Speaker Ryan, alone, may not be leading President Trump down the wrong path toward healthcare reform, but he may be clouding better options. There’s likely a much better path that saves his political capital and provides the American public with a much better healthcare system.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement