High Honors for the Left, Crickets for the Right
Sacrifice for the Cause
Coal Has Evolved. America Should Compete.
Applying 'Peace Through Strength' to Affordability: A Key to President Trump’s Wider Agend...
Reconciling America
Could Evil Netflix Still Devour Warner Bros.? Stranger Things...Has Happened!
'What’s Your Favorite Type of Abortion?' How to Win the Abortion Debate
Applying 'America First' to Avoid Moral Hazard
The CCP Doesn’t Need a Spy – It Just Needs Your Continuous Glucose...
Judge Allows Cameras in Charlie Kirk Murder Trial
Mexican National Faces Up to 15 Years for Running Alien Smuggling Operation Across...
Treasury Sanctions 10 Entities Across Middle East, Asia, and Europe Over Iran Arms...
New USDA Rule Will Demand SNAP Stores Stock More 'Real Food'
Could Courts Overturn California's Congressional Map Next? This Senator Thinks So.
OPINION

Cut the Waste. Not America’s Strength.

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Cut the Waste. Not America’s Strength.
AP Photo/Becky Bohrer

Washington has a bad habit of swinging first and thinking later. Not every problem is solved with a sledgehammer, and not every program that gets labeled as “DEI” is what it appears to be. I’ll say this clearly at the outset: President Donald Trump is right to take aim at bloated, performative programs that waste taxpayer dollars and prioritize ideology over results. That correction is long overdue, and most Americans agree with it. But supporting the mission does not mean abandoning discipline in how it is carried out.

Advertisement

What matters now is execution. In the rush to clean house, there is a real risk of treating fundamentally different programs as if they are all the same. That is where mistakes happen. Reform requires precision. It requires understanding the structure, purpose, and downstream impact of what is being changed. Otherwise, what begins as an effort to strengthen government efficiency can quickly turn into an unintended disruption in areas that are actually working.

Take the 8(a) program within the Small Business Administration. It often gets swept into the broader conversation around diversity-based contracting, and like any federal program, it is not immune to abuse or inefficiency. Those issues should be addressed directly. But parts of this system, particularly those tied to Alaska Native corporations, are not simply about preference or optics. They are embedded in a larger operational framework that supports contracting, logistics, and economic stability in regions where the margin for error is extremely small.

Alaska is not just geographically distant; it is strategically significant. It plays a critical role in national defense, resource development, and global competition, particularly as the United States looks to reduce reliance on adversaries like China. The infrastructure that supports operations in that environment is not easily replaced. It has been built over time, often under unique legal and economic arrangements that most policymakers rarely engage with directly. Disrupting that system without a clear transition plan does not create reform. It creates gaps.

Advertisement

Related:

ALASKA DONALD TRUMP

Those gaps are not theoretical. In remote and high-stakes environments, when systems fail, there is no immediate fallback. Contracts stall, logistics slow down, and capabilities weaken. That is not a political talking point; it is an operational reality. The goal of reform should be to eliminate waste and strengthen performance, not to introduce instability into areas that quietly carry significant weight.

None of this suggests that programs like 8(a) should be left untouched. Where there is abuse, it should be exposed. Where there are inefficiencies, they should be corrected. Accountability is essential, and no program should be above scrutiny. But there is a difference between targeted reform and broad dismantling. Ignoring that distinction risks undermining outcomes that policymakers are ultimately trying to improve.

President Trump has set a clear direction: reduce waste, restore merit, and make government work for the American people. Delivering on that vision requires more than speed. It requires disciplined execution. Legislators and policymakers are responsible for translating that direction into action, and that means approaching reform with a full understanding of the systems involved. Acting quickly without that understanding may satisfy a political moment, but it does not guarantee a stronger result. The objective is not simply to prove that something was cut.

Advertisement

The objective is to ensure that what remains is more effective, more resilient, and better aligned with national interests. That takes clarity, not guesswork. It takes control, not overcorrection. And it requires the willingness to distinguish between what should be eliminated and what should be strengthened.

If Washington is serious about getting this right, it needs to move with precision. Cut the waste. Fix what is broken. But do not weaken the very systems that help keep the country secure and competitive. That is how real reform is achieved, and that is how the mission succeeds.

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical Left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement