So, Nancy Mace's Gubernatorial Hopes Might've Been Nuked From Orbit...
Chuck Schumer Really Doesn't Want to Compensate Victims of Government Abuse
To Democrats, Cosplaying the Oppression of Women Is 'Fun'
Doug Burgum Schools CNN on What the Real D.C. Clean Up Scandal Should...
Javier Milei's Experiment in Pure Free Markets Just Proved the 'Experts' Wrong Again
Nick Shirley Questions What CA Dems Have to Hide as 'The Stop Nick...
Talarico Campaign Refuses to Deny He Had Inappropriate Relationships With Other Staffers
Slain Student's Family Blasts Chicago's Sanctuary Policies After Killer Found With Weapon...
New York's Government Won't Hand Over Documents About the CDL Holder Who Killed...
Graham Platner Ducks Media Interviews After Explosive Sexting Scandal
Anti-Weaponization Fund Gets Scrapped, But That's Not Enough for Chuck Schumer
Federal Court Blocks Trump Administration Ban on Transgender Service Members
Goodbye Pride Month, Hello Nuclear Family Month
She's Back? Janet Mills Hints at Last-Ditch Shake Up in Maine Senate Race
This Wacky Congresswoman Just Demanded an 'Underground Railroad for Abortion'
OPINION

Where is the Heat?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Where is the Heat?

During the ‘70’s the economy was, putting it mildly, overheating. Richard Nixon had cut the final cord to gold, originally initiated by FDR, the oil embargo crisis was in full bloom and prices were rising at a double digit rate. Paul Volcker and his Federal Reserve cronies came to the rescue with a powerful, dramatic and painful increase of interest rates to take the HEAT out of the economy. That action was THE, and some say only, legitimate weapon that the Fed had to slow down an overheated economy. Of course, in most recent times, Quantitative Easing, balance sheet expansion (with questionable and perhaps not quite legal assets) and continued jaw-boning have been the Fed’s weapons of choice to try and put some HEAT back into the economy.

Advertisement

Mortgage origination at all time lows, food stamp recipients at all time highs and millions not counted in the participation pool seems to prove that the Fed has been successful in keeping the dreaded hyperinflation or even simple inflation from infiltrating our economy.

Of course, the S & P is at all time highs proving once again the Fed is right on track for the top 1%.

Now the question on everyone’s lips is when, not if, the Federal Reserve will raise interest rates. They say they will continue to be “patient” and monitor the recovering strength of the economy before taking any action.

It is not a secret that a select few have benefited from the action of the central bank while the overwhelming majority of savers have suffered greatly. If the reason that rates are being raised is to give some type of return to the poor souls who live on a fixed income I can understand that but if the rationale for the raise is to slow down a questionable recovering economy then my question is simple - What are you slowing down? Everything from housing and precious metals to energy and manufacturing seemed to be entering their own tailspin.

Advertisement

If, however, the real reason for an increase is to deflate an artificially inflated bond market then please just say so.

In the ‘70’s it was pretty obvious but now, Janet, please!

WHERE’S THE HEAT?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement