Democrats Are Really Going with 'Graham Platner Was Too Stupid to Know What...
Chris Cuomo on the Dems' Latest Line for the Schumer Shutdown: They're Lying
Oh, Maine Dem Senate Candidate Also Trained With an Antifa-like Rifle Group?
Dem Who Said the Quiet Part Out Loud About the Schumer Shutdown Now...
Yes, a Hunting Stand Was Found With a Clear Sight Line to Trump's...
Texas Dem Suggests She’ll Slash Republicans in the Throat If They Try to...
Inflation Smashes Economists Expectations in September As Prices Hold Steady and Wages Ros...
'Sophia Strong': 12-Year-Old Annunciation Shooting Survivor Finally Returns Home After Mir...
Schumer Shutdown: Democrats Block Pay to Use Pain As Political Leverage While Donor...
Following Day Long Demonstration, Coast Guard Security Opened Fire on U-Haul Driver Outsid...
NYC Mayoral Frontrunner Zohran Mamdani Linked Again to Anti-LGBTQ Figures — This Time...
Nobody Asked for This: The IRS’s Plan to Take Over Tax Filing
With China and Trade, America Is Winning Again
'Gates of Hell?' More Like a House of Cards: Iran’s Bluster Does Not...
Do Palestinian Lives Matter?
OPINION

The Democrats' War on Small-Town Values and Property Values

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez, File

Across the U.S., Democrats are waging war to crush a lifestyle they abhor. Call it small-town America: single-family neighborhoods, quiet streets, town centers stamped with their own historic character, and almost no signs of the vagrancy and homeless encampments that plague cities.

Advertisement

Democrats want you to have none of this. If you've worked for years to save up for a home in one of these havens, forget about it.

The Democratic Party uses brute legal force to remake towns using a cookie-cutter formula that forces each to have the same proportion of houses and apartments, the same mix of low-, middle-, and upper-income residents, and the same reliance on public transit, all controlled by state politicians.

Any town that resists gets shamed as "segregated" -- though this isn't about race -- and "snobby."

On Saturday, the Connecticut legislature passed a bill, H.B. 5002, which should be called the Destroy Connecticut Towns Act. It's headed to Gov. Ned Lamont's desk for a signature. The new law dictates how many low-income and moderate-income apartments each Connecticut town must provide, and mandates that towns also foot the bill for the schools, parks, public transportation, and other services low-income residents will need. Local taxes will soar.

The bill explicitly says its purpose is to ensure "economic diversity" in each town. This is about social engineering, not remedying housing shortages.

Democrat Bob Duff, the state senate majority leader, says, "It's extremely important ... that we don't segregate people based on a ZIP code." Everyone, regardless of income, should have the opportunity to choose to live in any town.

The bill mandates that the wealthiest towns, mostly in lower Fairfield County, provide most of the new housing, even though that raises the cost. Land costs less in other towns, and lower-income people this bill is supposed to serve are more likely to find bus transportation and affordable stores in these other towns as well.

Advertisement

Connecticut lawmakers are nixing local rule. Ordinances that protect the appearance of a town have to be overruled. The bill states that multifamily buildings of up to 24 units will no longer have to provide off-street parking. Envision cars lining every residential street.

Towns also will be forced to welcome vagrants who want to sleep in parks and public lots. The bill outlaws "hostile architecture," meaning park benches with armrests and divided seating, or stone walls with spikes on top that deter sleeping in the rough.

Instead, the bill launches a program of mobile showers and mobile laundry services on trucks to serve the homeless wherever they choose. Picture the mobile showers pulling up to Greenwich Common Park on the town's main street, or Waveny Park in New Canaan.

How can kids walk around town with their pals if there are homeless encampments? Judge Glock, director of research at the Manhattan Institute think tank, points out that the homeless amount to 1% of the population in Los Angeles but commit 25% of the homicides. Inviting the homeless means inviting crime and drugs.

Californicating the small towns of Connecticut by encouraging public camping and vagrancy "is frightening," says Glock.

New York Democrats are also taking aim at small-town living. A bill sponsored by state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal would outlaw local towns setting minimum lot sizes over one-eighth of an acre near the town center and a half-acre everywhere else. Postage stamp sizes.

Riverhead, New York, Town Supervisor Tim Hubbard is vowing to sue. "We're trying to keep our community as rural as it can be. ... We don't think the state should be zoning our town."

Advertisement

Hoylman-Sigal chooses to live on the west side of Manhattan, but who is he to impose a population-dense lifestyle on small-town New Yorkers?

Similarly, in New Jersey, Democratic Gov. Tim Murphy is pushing lawmakers to override local ordinances and impose the same kinds "reforms" as those in the Connecticut bill.

In all these states and across the country, small-town Americans need to fight back. There is no constitutional right to live in a wealthy town with single-family homes and leafy, quiet streets.

It's something you earn.

Once you've purchased a home, you have a right to protect its value.

It's time to put blue-state politicians on notice that their battle to destroy our suburbs and small towns will be resisted at the voting booth and in court.

Betsy McCaughey is a former Lt. Governor of New York State and founder of SaveOurCity at savenyc.org. Follow her on Twitter @Betsy_McCaughey. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement