Post-Assad Syrian Christians Rise Up to Celebrate Christmas
The Details Are in on How the Feds Are Blowing Your Tax Dollars
Here's the Final Tally on How Much Money Trump Raised for Hurricane Victims
Since When Did We Republicans Start Being Against Punishing Criminals?
Poll Shows Americans Are Hopeful For 2025, and the Reason Why Might Make...
Protecting the Lives of Murderers, but Not Babies
Legal Group Puts Sanctuary Jurisdictions on Notice Ahead of Trump's Mass Deportation Opera...
Wishing for Santa-Like Efficiency in the USA
Celebrating the Miracle of Redemption
A Letter to Jesus
Here's Why Texas AG Ken Paxton Sued the NCAA
Of Course NYT Mocks the Virgin Mary
What Is With Jill Biden's White House Christmas Decorations?
Jesus Fulfilled Amazing Prophecies
Meet the Worst of the Worst Biden Just Spared From Execution
OPINION

No More Children Should Be Victims of COVID Vaccine Fanaticism

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
AP Photo/Steven Senne, File

In 2022, renown Duke University Hospital denied a 14-year-old North Carolina girl a kidney transplant because of her COVID-19 vaccination status. Now, her parents are trying to ensure that never happens to another family again. 

Advertisement

Yulia Hicks was born in Ukraine and adopted by North Carolina couple Chrissy and Lee Hicks in 2021.

The Hickses knew that Yulia had a kidney condition when they adopted her. Her condition, a rare, degenerative disorder known as Senior-Loken Syndrome, meant that she would eventually need a kidney transplant. Since she was receiving treatment at Duke University Hospital, the Hickses sought Yulia’s transplant there.

Duke, however, refused to provide Yulia with the life-saving surgery. A Duke representative told the Hickses, “If you don’t follow our [COVID-19] recommendations, then Yulia can’t be a transplant candidate here.”

Yulia had been receiving treatment at Duke for two years, and officials there were aware of her vaccine status. They were also aware that she had had a case of COVID-19, acquiring a certain level of immunity through it. So, the decision to deny her a transplant blindsided Yulia’s parents. Lee Hicks said, “It wasn't a requirement. It was … a recommendation … until the very end.”

It was a dark time for the Hicks family, but then something good happened. The media attention from their struggle with Duke Hospital helped them find "an amazing live donor," and Yulia received her life-saving kidney transplant at East Carolina University Health. Despite Duke University Hospital’s actions, Yulia will live.

While it is good that Yulia was able to receive life-saving treatment eventually, Duke University Hospital should not have denied her that treatment in the first place. Yulia is not alone. 17-year-old Jenna Campau was denied a kidney transplant in Michigan when her parents declined COVID vaccination. Leilani Lutali was denied a kidney transplant in Colorado unless her and her donor agreed to COVID vaccinations. D.J. Ferguson was denied a heart transplant over his vaccination status and died in a Boston Hospital. 

Advertisement

Hospitals across America have refused transplants to dying patients over the COVID vaccine. Lawmakers in North Carolina have the opportunity to lead the nation in ending this unjust practice.

Last year, legislators advanced identical bills in both chambers of the North Carolina General Assembly to prevent hospitals and other healthcare providers from refusing medical treatment based on a patient's COVID-19 vaccination status. 

The bills (called “No CV19 Discrimination/Organ Transplantation” in the Senate and simply “Yulia's Law” in the House) started with a finding that “a refusal to submit to a COVID-19 vaccination or series of vaccinations does not diminish an individual's right to health care.” They would then add teeth to that finding by making it unlawful for healthcare providers to “consider an individual ineligible to donate or receive an anatomical gift or organ transplant” based on “an individual's refusal to submit to a COVID-19 vaccination,” among other protections.

Yulia’s Law advanced rapidly in the House. It was filed in early April 2023 and came up for a final vote less than a month later. The House then approved it on a 91-25 vote, with 20 Democrats joining all Republicans voting “aye.” So far, so good.

Unfortunately, the Senate has been negligent. 

The Senate version of the bill was sent to that chamber’s Rules Committee, where it is said bills go to die, instead of the Health Care Committee. It has languished in Rules since April of 2023.

Advertisement

The House sent its version of Yulia’s Law to the Senate on May 3, 2023, but it was also sent to the Senate Rules graveyard.

If senators decide to report Yulia’s Law out of committee, there is little doubt it would receive broad bipartisan support as it did in the House. The question is, will Senate leaders allow it to come up for a vote? They should do so before the legislative short session ends this summer.

Yulia Hicks and any other victims of COVID vaccine fanaticism deserve at least that much.

 

Andy Jackson is Director of the Civitas Center for Public Integrity at the John Locke Foundation.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos