Of Course, the Media Is Freaking Out Over Trump's Military Parade, But They're...
The Pulitzer Prize Was Just Awarded to a Publication That Pushed a Fake...
How Barstool's Dave Portnoy Handled This Ambush by a Local News Outlet
All This WaPo Reporter Did Was Show She Doesn't Know the Difference Between...
This Headline Sort of Guts The Washington Post's Pulitzer Win for Covering the...
If There's Anyone That Deserves a Military Parade, It's Donald J. Trump
Can We Pay Liberals to Leave Too?
Young Trumpian Conservatives Are Like the Young Reagan Conservatives of Yesterday
Price Controls for Medicine Have a Devastating Cost
'Trump Knows…' Eclipses the Iconic Bo Jackson Commercial 'Bo Knows…'
Can the West Win Wars Again?
Securing Digital Dignity: A New Line of Defense for Americans
Ignore the Elites — President Trump’s Housing Plan Is Working
From the Gridiron to the Rose Garden — America’s Comeback Starts Here
Small Businesses Aren’t Hiring - Because Big Cronyism Is Eliminating Them
OPINION

The Fallacy of a Worthless Life

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

For good or for ill, when we hear someone talking about a “worthy life,” our minds usually equate it with a successful life. We may think of examples of people who have contributed to the betterment of mankind via technological advances, medicinal breakthroughs, or great strides in bringing peace to war-torn parts of the world.

Advertisement

However, when German scholars Karl Binding and Alfred Hoche reference a worthy life, they are differentiating between those whom they believe we are justified in killing (via abortion, euthanasia, etc.) and those whom we are not allowed to kill. And the book they’ve recently translated, “Allowing the Destruction of Life Unworthy of Living,” makes precisely these points.

Even more troubling (if justifying the intentional killing of humans can get more troubling) is that the book they’ve translated is from 1920 and helped “set the agenda for the Nazi program of extermination” by positing that “select people did not have the right to survive, such as disabled or terminally ill patients.”

The book was used to argue that the lives of those who were “seriously or terminally ill or [had] a mental or physical disability were ‘unworthy of being lived’” and should be ended via a “charitable death.”

L’Osservatore Romano, the semi-official newspaper of the Vatican, has noted that this book and those supporting it are applying “the same justifications that were used by the Nazis to champion their murderous eugenics program.”

Language is important. And L’Osservatore recognizes that the language being used in “Allowing the Destruction of Life” is demeaning not only to individuals facing special challenges but to life itself. Used as it was in the lead-up to World War II, this language not only justified numerous executions of the handicapped and the “racially impure,” but also millions upon millions of executions of Jews, Christians, and others deemed unworthy of Adolf Hitler’s high standard.

Advertisement

It is high time we ceased to allow words to be hijacked and used to suit the fleeting fancy of those within the culture of death. When the rubber hits the road, in real terms, there is no “worthy life” or “unworthy life.” Rather, all human life is worthy of protection because all life is sacred, as it was created in the image and likeness of our Creator.

We must continue to fight for those who are unable to fight for themselves—especially unborn and handicapped persons who often live at the mercy at others. And we must somehow inculcate again the truth that life itself is worthy of living and of defending.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement